Flash, STT-MRAM and resistive RAM: They all come with different challenges

By Arnaud Furnemont, Department Director Memory at imec

Research in memory is really exciting these days: in parallel you have the scaling of classical memories (SRAM, DRAM, Flash) and the emergence of new memories capable of enabling new applications or even new system hierarchies. At imec, we mostly focus on three concepts which all come with different challenges.

First is Flash, and specifically 3D NAND. Here it’s the integration challenge that is keeping us all busy. Before, the focus was on device scaling, but now it’s all about stacking more layers. Last year, we explored new materials for the channel (e.g. III-V channel in 3D NAND) and for the trapping layer (YAlO instead of SiN), in parallel with device reliability characterization and modelling.

Another important memory type is STT-MRAM where a complex magnetic stack makes the scene. Focus here is on choosing the right material combination and developing the perfect stack (with perfect interfaces!). Over the last years, imec made a lot of progress to build a good stack. But even more challenging is the patterning of this multi-layers structure without affecting the magnetic properties of the device. Very recently we were able to demonstrate 45nm devices with good performance. Tool suppliers are improving the etch platforms and I expect STT-MRAM as embedded memory in the foundries by 2017 and as standalone memory by 2020. In the latter case, more scaling is necessary and this implies more etch issues which will have to be solved.

Thirdly, we explore resistive RAM. The challenge for this type of memory is picking the right combination out of the numerous kinds of stacks and materials. And to do this, you need a fundamental understanding of what happens inside each stack. Imec has developed in depth characterization and modelling on OxRAM and CBRAM memories, expected to be used in embedded applications. Globally, RRAM suffers from a trade-off between write energy and stability. VMCO is another RRAM variant developed at imec to break this trade-off. To be competitive in standalone applications, RRAM will also need to be combined with a selector, which requires again material selection and benchmarking. This is a role that imec is willing to take on for its partners.

Finally, there is also a high-level challenge that the memory researchers and developers are facing. It’s the changing landscape in which emerging memories have more and more impact on the system architecture. Before, the system hierarchy was built with the memory technologies that were available. In the future it might be the other way around: the system architects will tell us what to develop. A closer collaboration between the device team and system architects is therefore indispensable. Imec’s memory ‘insite’ activity will tackle this challenge. 

After a master in electro-mechanics, Arnaud Furnémont completed his PhD at IMEC, focusing on characterization of nitride-based memory such as NROM and TANOS. In 2008, he joined Intel in Boise (Idaho) and became responsible for 20nm planar Flash reliability, and later for an emerging memory concept. In 2013 he joined IMEC as memory characterization and integration teams manager. Since end of 2014, Arnaud serves as memory department director, MRAM and Flash program director at imec.

POST A COMMENT

Easily post a comment below using your Linkedin, Twitter, Google or Facebook account. Comments won't automatically be posted to your social media accounts unless you select to share.

One thought on “Flash, STT-MRAM and resistive RAM: They all come with different challenges

  1. Edward Grochowski

    The IMEC article infers that STTRAM does not require a selector technology
    as an integral part of the storage cell (for memory). In fact like RRAM it does .
    Most depictions of STTRAM show a CMOS driver but to achieve better density
    a diode will be required, perhaps a Schottky device. Investigations are underway
    achieve this.

Comments are closed.