AUG. 21–ROCKVILLE, MD–The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today announced that it will launch a significant new initiative to enhance the regulation of pharmaceutical manufacturing and product quality and hone in on a 21st century focus.
“We are approaching the 25th anniversary of current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMPs). There have been a lot of changes in that time, and it’s time for a reevaluation,” Janet Woodcock, director of the agency’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), told reporters during a press conference this morning.
The initiative focuses on FDA’s cGMPs program and will cover veterinary and human drugs, including human biological drug products such as vaccines.
“Americans expect that their medicines will be of the highest quality, and assuring that quality is one of FDA’s core missions,” says FDA Deputy Commissioner Dr. Lester M. Crawford. “FDA’s regulatory and quality control systems for pharmaceutical products have become a gold standard for the world, and we Americans should be proud that the quality of the medicines we have available to us and our animals is second to none. Any system can be improved upon, however, and with this risk-based, highly integrative cGMP initiative we intend to do just that. We know we can make even a very good system better. Publicizing today this blueprint for action is just the first step.”
This initiative, according to the agency, is designed to improve public health promotion and protection by focusing on three major goals that will augment FDA’s pharmaceutical product quality assurance programs across the board.
The first goal is to enhance the focus of the agency’s cGMP requirements more squarely on potential risks to public health, by providing additional regulatory attention and agency resources on those aspects of manufacturing that pose the greatest potential risk.
The second goal will be to help ensure that FDA’s essential work in establishing and enforcing pharmaceutical product quality standards does not impede innovation and the introduction of new manufacturing technologies in the pharmaceutical industry. The third goal will be enhancing the consistency and predictability of FDA’s approach to assuring production quality and safety among the FDA’s centers and field components.
FDA cannot accomplish these goals alone, says John Taylor, director of the office of enforcement.
“We’ll need international cooperation,” he adds. “FDA will be collaborating with other regulatory authorities to ensure public health protection.”
Given the global nature of pharmaceutical production today, the agency announced that it fully intends to undertake this initiative in close concert and consultation with its regulatory counterparts internationally.
In addition, the success of this initiative is strongly dependent on active participation and input from manufacturing quality control experts from industry, academia, government, and consumer groups, and FDA will be actively soliciting such participation as the initiative progresses.
More than 40 years ago, Congress instructed FDA to require that all drugs be produced according to current good manufacturing practice. This requirement came in response to significant concerns about substandard drug manufacturing practices at that time, and it brought modern quality assurance and control principles to drug manufacturing.
In announcing this cGMP initiative, Crawford emphasized that it will be overseen by a steering committee that includes representatives from all the affected FDA centers: the Office of Regulatory Affairs, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, the Center for Veterinary Medicine, and the Office of the Commissioner.
He noted in addition that this task will be driven by the latest science and technology and will strengthen the public health protection achieved by FDA’s regulation of pharmaceutical manufacturing. He added that FDA remains committed to strong enforcement of the existing regulatory requirements, even as we are examining and revising our approach to these programs.
He also pointed out that this work may take time – potentially up to two years, or more, for certain aspects of this initiative.