Tag Archives: letter-pulse-top

Beyond economic limits due to litho limitations, the inherent need for a physical barrier puts an electrical limit on the ability to scale.

BY ED KORCZYNSKI, Senior Technical Editor

On-chip interconnects for ICs have evolved to meet different exacting needs, and the most advanced chips require multiple levels of copper (Cu) metal lines and via connections between transistors. When scaling Cu lines to the finest dimensions possible to interconnect local transistors in advanced manufacturing nodes, there are economic limits due to lithography technology. Also, the inherent need for a physical barrier to surround Cu and prevent poisonous out-diffusion imposes an electrical limit on the ability to scale. Best practices today include an explicit hierarchy of dimensions and a stacking-order for on-chip interconnects: local between nearby transistors, global between functional blocks, as well as input/output (I/O) and power/ ground connections. With advanced logic chips having >12 levels of on-chip copper metallization, only the bottom-most are at the tightest pitch. Table1 (courtesy of imec) shows the hierarchy of interconnect signals for a 14nm-node finFET logic chip, and the tightest pitch is 42nm as used for the vertical gate contacts as well as for the metal-1 (M1) and metal-2 (M2) levels. The last published International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) chapter for Interconnects that included detailed tables of on-chip metal specifications was published in 2012. In the ITRS 2012 Interconnect chapter Table 2 on microprocessor (MPU) requirements, the “Intermediate Wires” specification for Metal 2 (M2) is the same as for Metal 1 (M1) level and shows 32nm half-pitch is manufacturable, which is used with MPU physical gate lengths of 22nm.

interconnects table

FIGURE 1 shows the fraction of the intermediate wire volume that is Cu depending on the thickness of the barrier for succeeding generations of high-performance (HP) MPUs. Note that in the SEM cross-section on the right that the 10nm of Cu is only 50% of the line thickness, and that such a line would be extremely susceptible to current-crowding and premature circuit failure due to electro-migration (EM).

interconnects 1

In minimally-scaled Cu wiring, resistivity increases arise due to electron scattering from the sidewalls and grain boundaries. Tricky process integration involving electro-chemical deposition (ECD) of the Cu along with careful thermal annealing is already being used to grow large columnar grains across the trench—resembling bamboo when cut in cross-section—to minimize the volume of grain-boundaries. Forming columnar lines of single Cu grains after ECD requires control of barrier atomic-layer deposition (ALD) parameters, along with chemical-mechanical planarization (CMP) and rapid-thermal annealing (RTA) processes.

When engineering materials, first-order parameters to be controlled include composition and uniformity, while second-order parameters include internal structure such as crystal orientation or average crystal grain-size in multi-crystalline structures. In general, it is more difficult and far more expensive to control second-order parameters in manufacturing, and when engineering at the atomic scale it is yet more difficult to control third- order parameters such as grain boundary orientation.

Since the industry must control third-order parameters to continue using Cu metal, there has been ongoing R&D of non-metallic materials that could be integrated into ICs as on-chip conductors. Superconductors have been found that can exhibit zero resistance to electric current flow, but only when they are frozen to extremely low temper- atures such that phonon vibrations within their lattices settle out. Recently, a team of six Japanese research groups tested nearly 1000 materials over a four year period and found no superconductors with critical temperatures (Tc) above the 298°K of room temperature.

The rapid increase in resistivity when Cu lines are scaled to minimal dimensions motivates the search for “ballistic” conductors which are immune from electron scattering effects. While R&D into graphene and Carbon Nano-Tubes (CNT) as on-chip conductors continues, there are inherent issues with integrating any such technologies into high-volume manufacturing (HVM) to achieve superior performance compared to legacy Cu. The ITRS 2012 Interconnects chapter summarizes the issues:

Ballistic transport in one dimensional systems, such as silicides, carbon nano tubes, nanowires, graphene nanoribbons or topological insulators offers potential solutions. While ballistic transport has many advantages in narrow dimensions, most of these options incur fundamental, quantized resistances associated with any conversions of transport media, such as from Cu to CNTs. In addition to the quantum resistance, the technological problems of utilizing an additional conduction medium with its interface, substrate and integration issues, pose substantial barriers to the imple- mentation of ballistic transport media.

Imec recently published preliminary “7nm-node” finFET specifications for logic ICs having 14nm gate lengths, with expectation that delays in the implementation of EUV lithography call for use of multiple-patterning using 193-immersion (193i). M1 layer patterning at 18nm half-pitch can be done with self-aligned double- patterning (SADP) technology, while Litho-Etch-Litho- Etch (LELE) patterning with two masks allows for 24nm half-pitch patterning of more arbitrary 2D shapes for easier routing. Going to tighter half-pitches will require Litho-Etch-Litho-Etch-Litho-Etch (LELELE) with three masks, or self-aligned quadruple patterning (SAQP) schemes, which is why the number of metal levels for logic continues to increase with each successive node.

In memory chips with regular bit arrays for storage and orthogonal bit:word architectures, leading 3D architectures use similar metal interconnect half-pitches. FIGURE 2 shows a new 3D stacked NAND Flashmemoryarchitecturethatwill be shown at the 2015 IEEE International Electron Device Meeting (IEDM) in presentation 3.2, “A Novel Double-Density, Single-Gate Vertical Channel (SGVC) 3D NAND Flash That Is Tolerant to Deep Vertical Etching CD Variation and Possesses Robust Read-disturb Immunity,” by Hang-Ting Lue et al. of Macronix.

interconnects 2

The Metal Level 2 Bit Line (ML2 BL) half-pitch of ~25nm in parallel lines in this 3D NAND structure can be formed with SADP litho. Since SADP has been used in HVM of 2D NAND cells, presumably the complex SADP integrated process flow has already been established. Imec has shown ability to reach 18nm half-pitch with SADP 193i, so this new 3D NAND structure might be able to be shrunk by a “half-node” without having to re-engineer the ML2 BL fab process flow.

Even if the lithographic cost of scaling metal lines to <18nm half-pitch could be managed, the Cu barrier provides a functional limit as shown in Fig. 1. Assuming that Cu multi-level interconnects will be current-limited and will require ~3nm barriers—to prevent out-diffusion from the line as well as EM-induced diffusion within the line—the industry is already considering atomic limits. The barrier would be ~1/3 of 18nm, ~1/2 of 12nm, and ~2/3 of 9nm wide Cu lines.

It is possible to fabricate copper pillars more than 100μm in height, with aspect ratios up to 6:1, using advanced packaging stepper lithography in conjunction with electroplating.

BY KEITH BEST, Rudolph Technologies, Wilmington, MA, and PHILLIP HOLMES, TEL NEXX, Billerica, MA

Recent years have seen rapid development in the area of advanced packaging. In general, advanced packaging processes are concerned with the interconnection of multiple chips in a single package to provide increased functionality and performance in a smaller volume. System Scaling Technology — the combination of front-end, middle-end and back-end to advance microelectronic systems—utilizes many different advanced packaging approaches, one of which is known as 2.5D packaging. The term “2.5D packaging” has not always been used consistently in literature. The definition used for the purpose of this paper can be summarized as follows: a 2.5D package utilizes an interposer between multiple silicon die and a system-in-package (SiP) substrate, where this interposer has through vias connecting the metallization layers on its front and back surfaces (FIGURE 1).

FIGURE 1. A 2.5D IC/SiP using an interposer and through vias.

FIGURE 1. A 2.5D IC/SiP using an interposer and through vias.

 

The development of these new packaging schemes is being driven primarily by the rapid growth in mobile handheld devices such as smartphones. Often, the manufacturing processes used are adaptations of well-established front-end processes. A number of different approaches are in development or already in production, including wafer-level chip scale packaging, copper pillar bumps on through silicon vias (TSVs), fan-out wafer level processing, and many more. Of particular interest is the replacement of solder bumps by fine pitch copper pillar bumps, which has been the subject of many new system- in-package designs. Here we investigate the lithography and plating of copper pillars, with focus on heights in excess of 100μm and diameters of 25μm, in anticipation of future SiP requirements.

The increase in the number of I/O channels required by multi-chip system designs has exceeded the density and pitch capabilities that traditional solder bump processes can deliver, so that an alternative connection scheme is required. For interposers, the key enabling technology has been the development of fine pitch copper pillar bumps to provide the high-density interconnection between the interposer and the die. Copper pillar bumps provide a number of advantages over the solder bumps they are supplanting. They can deliver finer pitches, 40μm and less have been demonstrated. They also provide superior electromigration performance in applications where high current-carrying capacity is required. However, lithography and electroplating for fine pitch copper pillar bumps can be particularly challenging. The pillars are electroplated into openings in a thick layer of photoresist which exceeds the capability of most front-end tools. Typically, today’s copper pillars range from 30-50μm in height, with height to width aspect ratios from 1:1 to around 2:1 Here we describe the lithography, resist, and electroplating systems and processes required to create 5:1 aspect ratio copper pillars with heights in excess of 100μm.

Photoresist

A negative tone photoresist (JSR THB-151N) was chosen for this work. Its acrylate groups cross-link on exposure and are developed in industry standard 2.38% TMAH developer. The photoresist was spun to a thickness of 120μm on 300mm silicon wafers with an under bump metallization (UBM) prepared seed layer. To reach the 120μm photoresist film thickness, two coatings of photoresist were required, soft baked at 130C, 300secs and 130C, 360secs respectively. After coating, the photo- resist film was allowed to rehydrate for one hour prior to exposure on a wafer stepper (Rudolph Technologies’ JetStep System).

Lithography

We used a customized test reticle that included a wide range of sizes and pitches to expose the wafer. When processing a thick photoresist, well-controlled sidewall angles are a critical requirement, especially when electroplating tall copper pillars. Most front-end tools have high numerical aperture (NA) lenses with low depth of focus (DOF) that prevent adequate exposure of thick films with sufficient image contrast to meet the sidewall angle and resolution requirements. Mask aligners also struggle with high aspect ratio imaging, not because of their NA, but because they are unable to provide the necessary focus offset required to expose the film at high resolution, ultimately limiting their aspect ratio and sidewall angle control. Although photoresist sidewall angles are primarily a function of the photoresist material and its processing (pre-bake, post-bake, developing, etc.), the exposure system plays an important role. Accurate focus control across the wafer or substrate is required to achieve consistent and accurate CD control with straight and perpendicular sidewalls.

The lithography stepper employed in this study refocuses for each exposure to ensure optimal focal plane height on advanced packaging substrates that are frequently warped by film stress and thermal cycling. The system’s 0.1 NA provides a large depth of focus to maintain image integrity and CD control through thick films. The stepper lens is achromatized and the installed “filter wheel” provides a choice of illumination wavelengths to expose the photoresist layers: “broadband” ghi (350-450nm), gh (390 to 450nm) or i-line (365nm). This study, with a photoresist thickness of 120μm, required high energy illumination of >1000 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>, so broadband illumi- nation (g,h,i wavelengths) was employed to maintain high throughput.

The coated wafers were exposed using a focus exposure matrix wafer layout which provided a large number of programmed focus and exposure conditions at a fixed stepping distance to enable quick and efficient character- ization of the lithography process window for any pillar CD. After exposure, the wafers were developed for a total time of 180 secs, using 6 puddles in 2.38% TMAH. A number of wafers were processed in this way to provide images of the resist structures prior to the electroplating process. The SEM micrograph in FIGURE 2 shows a cross section of the photoresist via mold structures, the CD limit appears to be 25μm with this process, since the via is not open to the seed metal beyond this resolution.

lithography 2

It is interesting to note how the sidewall angle of the photoresist changes with decreasing CD suggesting that the plating will generate a “pedestal” type of copper pillar base at larger CDs, becoming progressively more vertical at smaller CDs. However, upon closer inspection of the smallest CDs, a slight “footing” can be observed at the base of the via (FIGURE 3), and this could result in slight undercut of the final copper pillar. The footing effect was most likely the result of our unoptimized develop process.

lithography 3

Electroplating

After the lithography processing, the wafers were sent to TEL NEXX for electroplating. The plating process employed the TEL NEXX Stratus P300 System, a fully automated electrochemical deposition system for advanced wafer-level packaging applications. The system deposits thick metal layers for wafer bumping, redistribution layers, TSVs, integrated passives, and MEMS.

In this study, we used a methanesulfonic acid copper chemistry with organic additives. The bath composition, operating temperature and current waveform were optimized for high speed copper plating into very thick resist features with flat bump profiles. After plating the photoresist was stripped using an immersion bath with EKC162 solution at 60 degrees. To preserve the profile of the photoresist mold the seed layer was not etched. The final copper pillar structures exhibit the inverse photo- resist mold profile (FIGURE 4).

lithography 4

The electroplating process successfully deposited copper in the photoresist via “molds” that were open to the copper seed material, producing good quality copper pillars with a final minimum copper pillar CD of 20μm, indicating a process bias of 5μm. This bias enabled the final copper pillar to reach a 6:1 aspect ratio as shown in FIGURE 5.

lithography 5

The final copper pillars exhibit excellent sidewall angle, 90 degrees for the smaller CDs. The profiles correlate well with the profiles observed in the photoresist SEM cross sections. The change in profile at the base of the photoresist for the smaller CDs did result in a slight undercut of the final copper pillar. The removal of this photoresist foot could be achieved by either increasing the de-scum time or modifying the develop recipe. The larger copper pillars tended to flare out slightly at the base (FIGURE 6) compensating for any undercut. This will benefit the structure during the removal of the copper seed layer.

lithography 6

The rheology of the copper pillar surface is very important for bonding reliability and the uniform plating of Sn solder, which was not performed during this particular study since it was not the primary objective. FIGURE 7 shows the flat top surface of a copper pillar which is free of voids and defects.

lithography 7

For advanced packaging applications, precise copper pillar height control is essential, and lithography CD control plays an important part in the plating process since CD variation directly affects plated height. The electroplating rate is proportional to current per unit area, i.e. the open area at the bottom of the photoresist openings at the beginning of the process, and the area of the evolving metal surface during deposition. Variation in CD or sidewall angle across the wafer will result in a corresponding change in copper pillar height. For example, in the case of copper pillar features a 5% change in CD can cause a 10% change in plated height.

Conclusion

The results of this study prove that it is possible to fabricate copper pillars more than 100μm in height, with aspect ratios up to 6:1, using advanced packaging stepper lithography in conjunction with electroplating. As advanced packaging requirements continue to evolve, the ability to create smaller copper pillar CDs at finer pitches in thick films will provide increased I/O density opportunities for SiP designers. Furthermore, it is clear that achieving high yield and reliability in the final package requires precise CD control throughout the entire photoresist profile to ensure consistent copper pillar height.

KEITH BEST is director applications engineering at Rudolph Technologies, Wilmington, MA. PHILLIP HOLMES is director of technology at TEL NEXX, Billerica, MA

NXP Semiconductors N.V. and Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. announced the completion of the merger pursuant to the terms of the previously announced merger agreement from March 2015. The merger has created a high performance mixed signal semiconductor industry leader, with combined revenue of over $10 billion. The merged entity will continue operations as NXP Semiconductors N.V. and has become the market leader in automotive semiconductor solutions and in general purpose microcontroller (MCU) products.

“Through this merger we have created an industry powerhouse focused on the high growth opportunities in the Smarter World, capitalizing on the emerging opportunities offered by the accelerating demand for connectivity, processing and security. Today’s formation of the new NXP is a transformative step on our journey to become the industry leader in high performance mixed signal solutions,” said Rick Clemmer, NXP Chief Executive Officer. “This merger enables us to deliver more complete solutions to our customers as we are emerging as the leader in the Secure Connections – and the supporting infrastructure – for the Smarter World domain. As a result, we reiterate today that we fully expect to continue to significantly out-grow the overall market, drive world-class profitability and generate even more cash, allowing us to continue creating significant value for NXP’s shareholders.”

As previously announced, the transaction is expected to be accretive to NXP non-GAAP earnings in 2016, and NXP anticipates achieving cost savings of $200 million in 2016 with a clear path to $500 million of annual cost synergies.

NXP also today announced the closing of the divestiture of its RF Power business to Jianguang Asset Management Co. Ltd (“JAC Capital”), after receiving official confirmation that JAC Capital has deposited the required funds at its bank in China to pay the purchase price. The cash proceeds for the sale will be received later this month following the required regulatory filings for cross-border transfers of funds from China. NXP has obtained bridge financing until the funds are received.

Related news: 

NXP-Freescale merger to result in world’s eighth largest chip maker

Freescale and NXP agree to $40 Billion merger

Historic era of consolidation for chip makers

The Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) announced worldwide sales of semiconductors reached $29.0 billion for the month of October 2015, 1.9 percent higher than the previous month’s total of $28.4 billion and 2.5 percent lower than the October 2014 total of $29.7 billion. The Americas market posted 3.9 percent growth compared to last month, leading all regions. All monthly sales numbers are compiled by the World Semiconductor Trade Statistics (WSTS) organization and represent a three-month moving average. Additionally, a new WSTS industry forecast projects slight market growth for the next three years.

“Global semiconductor sales have shown signs of stabilizing in recent months, with October marking the third straight month of month-to-month growth,” said John Neuffer, president and CEO, Semiconductor Industry Association. “Year-to-date sales are narrowly ahead of where they were through the same time last year, and slight growth is projected for next year and beyond.”

Month-to-month sales increased across all regional markets: the Americas (3.9 percent), China (1.6 percent), Europe (1.2 percent), Japan (0.4 percent), and Asia Pacific/All Other (1.7 percent). Compared to October 2014, sales were up in China (5.7 percent), but down in the Americas (-5.6 percent), Europe (-9.4), Japan (-10.5 percent), and Asia Pacific/All Other (-2.4 percent).

Additionally, SIA endorsed the WSTS Autumn 2015 global semiconductor sales forecast, which projects the industry’s worldwide sales will reach $336.4 billion in 2015, a 0.2 percent increase from the 2014 sales total. WSTS projects year-to-year increases for 2015 in Asia Pacific (3.9 percent), with decreases projected for the Americas (-0.6 percent), Europe (-8.2 percent), and Japan (-10.3 percent).

Beyond 2015, the global market is expected to grow at a modest pace. WSTS forecasts 1.4 percent growth globally for 2016 ($341.0 billion in total sales) and 3.1 percent growth for 2017 ($351.6 billion). WSTS tabulates its semi-annual industry forecast by convening an extensive group of global semiconductor companies that provide accurate and timely indicators of semiconductor trends.

October 2015

Billions

Month-to-Month Sales                               

Market

Last Month

Current Month

% Change

Americas

5.82

6.05

3.9%

Europe

2.87

2.90

1.2%

Japan

2.69

2.70

0.4%

China

8.45

8.58

1.6%

Asia Pacific/All Other

8.58

8.72

1.7%

Total

28.41

28.96

1.9%

Year-to-Year Sales                          

Market

Last Year

Current Month

% Change

Americas

6.41

6.05

-5.6%

Europe

3.21

2.90

-9.4%

Japan

3.01

2.70

-10.5%

China

8.12

8.58

5.7%

Asia Pacific/All Other

8.94

8.72

-2.4%

Total

29.68

28.96

-2.5%

Three-Month-Moving Average Sales

Market

May/Jun/Jul

Aug/Sept/Oct

% Change

Americas

5.51

6.05

9.7%

Europe

2.83

2.90

2.5%

Japan

2.63

2.70

2.3%

China

8.18

8.58

5.0%

Asia Pacific/All Other

8.71

8.72

0.2%

Total

27.87

28.96

3.9%

“Advanced packaging will reach 44% of packaging services and a revenue of US$ 30 billion by 2020,” Yole Développement (Yole) announced. Overall, the main advanced packaging market is the mobile sector with end products such as smartphones and tablets. Other high volume applications include servers, PC, game stations, external HDD/USB and more.

According to Yole’s latest advanced packaging report entitled “Status of the Advanced Packaging Industry” (2015 Edition), emerging applications are coming from the IoT world, with wearables and home appliances (connected home) solutions already penetrating the market. Other early stage IoT investments have been also made in smart cities, connected cars, industrial devices, medical applications…

In parallel, the Chinese companies play an important role in the advanced packaging market growth: “At Yole, we see an increased activity of Chinese capital in the advanced packaging industry,” explains Andrej Ivankovic, Technology & Market Analyst, Advanced Packaging & Semiconductor Manufacturing at Yole. “The objective of the semiconductor transformation in China is to decrease external dependency and set up a complete internal supply chain that can serve domestic and international customers.”

In this context, what would be the evolution of the advanced packaging industry? What will be the status of the supply chain by 2020? Which packaging technologies will be the most critical tomorrow and after? With the emergence of IoT applications, the development of local Chinese industry and numerous M&A coming from the overall semiconductor industry and the direct impact on the advanced packaging supply chain. Yole’s advanced packaging analysts offer you insight into the new advanced packaging world.

“Status of the Advanced Packaging Industry” report (2015 edition) released by Yole, the “More than Moore” market research and strategy consulting company, provides an high added-value market overview of the industrial landscape; under this new report, Yole’s advanced packaging team proposes a comprehensive analysis of the technology trends and also assesses the future development of the advanced packaging market.

packaging industry graph

This analysis confirms the market positioning of Yole and highlights the knowledge and deep understanding of the company within this industrial field.

According to Yole’s estimates, advanced packaging services revenue will increase by US$9.8 billion from 2014 to 2020 at a CAGR of 7%, in majority due to high volume adoption of Fan-Out WLP, 2.5D/3D and evolution and growth of Fan-In WLP and flip-chip. Advanced packages currently account for 38% of all packaging services or US$ 20.2 billion and are expected to grow share to 44% and US$ 30 billion by 2020.

The mobile sector remains the main advanced packaging market with smartphones and tablets as end products. Other high volume applications include servers, PC, game stations, HDD/USB, WiFi hardware, base stations, TVs and set top boxes. The scent of IoT is spreading with first products already on the market in the form of wearables and smart home appliances. Further early stage investments are made in sectors such as smart cities, connected cars, various industrial devices and medical applications.

The flip-chip platform represents a large mature market and leads in packaging services revenue and wafer count. Fan-In WLP leads in unit count due to small size compared to demanded volume. Adoption of wafer level packages continues. Teardowns performed by Yole and its sister company, System Plus Consulting on 3 high end smartphones (more info on i-micronews.com, reports section or click here directly for iPhone 6+, Samsung Galaxy S6 as well as the Huawei Ascend Mate 7 analysis, that will be available soon) indicated a high penetration rate of WLP, 30% on average. Fan-Out WLP is expected to make a major breakthrough within the next year, likely led by TSMC inFO PoP and followed by other Fan-Out multi die solutions. Long term, a bright future lies ahead for wafer level packages with respect to IoT requirements as they are well position to answer related cost, form and functional integration demands. When it comes to advanced feature sizes, a competitive sub 10 µm / 10 µm arena is established where organic wafer level packages aggressively compete with advanced organic flip-chip substrates and 2.5D / 3D Si/glass interposers.

As WLP pin counts grow, thicknesses and overall cost decrease, the evolution of Fan-In WLP and in particular a breakthrough of Fan-Out WLP are expected to result in a takeover of a part of the flip-chip market. With the breakthrough of Fan-Out WLP, the packaging landscape might drastically change, with an IDM and foundry leading all packaging services by wafer count.

The full advanced packaging analysis is today available; in the report Yole’s analysts present revenue, wafer and unit forecasts per advanced packaging platform and production breakdown by device type such as analog/mixed signal, wireless/RF, logic and memory, CMOS image sensors, MEMS, LED and LCD display drivers.

IC Insights will release its new 2016 McClean Report late next month.  The 2016 McClean Report will include a ranking of the top-50 semiconductor suppliers’ for 2015 as well as the top-50 fabless semiconductor suppliers.  The forecasted “post-merger” top-10 2015 IDM and fabless semiconductor suppliers are covered in this research bulletin.

Unlike the relatively close annual market growth relationship between fabless semiconductor suppliers and foundries, fabless semiconductor company sales growth versus IDM (integrated device manufacturers) semiconductor supplier growth has typically been very different (Figure 1).  In 2010, for the first and only time on record thus far, IDM semiconductor sales growth (35%) outpaced fabless semiconductor company sales growth (29%).  Since very few fabless semiconductor suppliers participate in the memory market, the fabless suppliers did not receive much of a boost from the surging DRAM and NAND flash memory markets in 2010, which grew 75% and 44%, respectively.

As shown in Figure 2, only three of the top-10 IDM semiconductor suppliers are forecast to register growth in 2015 and, in total, the top-10 IDMs are expected to display flat growth this year.  Although flat growth by the top-10 IDMs would typically be considered poor performance, it is still forecast to be a much better result than is expected from the top-10 fabless semiconductor suppliers (Figure 3).  In order to make direct comparisons for year-over-year growth, IC Insights combined the merged, or soon to be merged, companies’ 2014 and 2015 semiconductor sales regardless of when the merger occurred.

As shown, the top-10 fabless semiconductor suppliers are forecast to register a 5% decline in sales this year, five points worse than the top-10 IDMs.  It should be noted that essentially all of the decline expected for the top-10 fabless suppliers in 2015 could be attributed to the forecasted decline in Qualcomm/CSR’s sales this year.  Much of the sharp decline in Qualcomm/CSR’s sales this year is being driven by Samsung’s increasing use of its internally developed Exynos application processor in its smartphones instead of the application processors it had previously sourced from Qualcomm.

Fig 1

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 3

Application processor sales to fabless/system house Apple from pure-play foundry TSMC are included in the fabless company sales ranking under the “Apple/TSMC” moniker.  Application processor sales supplied to Apple from IDM-foundry Samsung are included as part of Samsung’s logic IC sales.

As mentioned in the title of this Research Bulletin, 2015 could end up being only the second year ever, after 2010, in which the IDM semiconductor suppliers outpace the fabless semiconductor suppliers with regard to year-over-year growth.  Whether this actually takes place will be revealed from IC Insights’ extended compilation of the IDM and fabless semiconductor company rankings for the 2016 McClean Report.

Researchers from North Carolina State University have discovered a new phase of solid carbon, called Q-carbon, which is distinct from the known phases of graphite and diamond. They have also developed a technique for using Q-carbon to make diamond-related structures at room temperature and at ambient atmospheric pressure in air.

Phases are distinct forms of the same material. Graphite is one of the solid phases of carbon; diamond is another.

“We’ve now created a third solid phase of carbon,” says Jay Narayan, the John C. Fan Distinguished Chair Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at NC State and lead author of three papers describing the work. “The only place it may be found in the natural world would be possibly in the core of some planets.”

Q-carbon has some unusual characteristics. For one thing, it is ferromagnetic — which other solid forms of carbon are not.

“We didn’t even think that was possible,” Narayan says.

In addition, Q-carbon is harder than diamond, and glows when exposed to even low levels of energy.

“Q-carbon’s strength and low work-function — its willingness to release electrons — make it very promising for developing new electronic display technologies,” Narayan says.

But Q-carbon can also be used to create a variety of single-crystal diamond objects. To understand that, you have to understand the process for creating Q-carbon.

Researchers start with a substrate, such as such as sapphire, glass or a plastic polymer. The substrate is then coated with amorphous carbon — elemental carbon that, unlike graphite or diamond, does not have a regular, well-defined crystalline structure. The carbon is then hit with a single laser pulse lasting approximately 200 nanoseconds. During this pulse, the temperature of the carbon is raised to 4,000 Kelvin (or around 3,727 degrees Celsius) and then rapidly cooled. This operation takes place at one atmosphere — the same pressure as the surrounding air.

The end result is a film of Q-carbon, and researchers can control the process to make films between 20 nanometers and 500 nanometers thick.

By using different substrates and changing the duration of the laser pulse, the researchers can also control how quickly the carbon cools. By changing the rate of cooling, they are able to create diamond structures within the Q-carbon.

“We can create diamond nanoneedles or microneedles, nanodots, or large-area diamond films, with applications for drug delivery, industrial processes and for creating high-temperature switches and power electronics,” Narayan says. “These diamond objects have a single-crystalline structure, making them stronger than polycrystalline materials. And it is all done at room temperature and at ambient atmosphere – we’re basically using a laser like the ones used for laser eye surgery. So, not only does this allow us to develop new applications, but the process itself is relatively inexpensive.”

And, if researchers want to convert more of the Q-carbon to diamond, they can simply repeat the laser-pulse/cooling process.

If Q-carbon is harder than diamond, why would someone want to make diamond nanodots instead of Q-carbon ones? Because we still have a lot to learn about this new material.

“We can make Q-carbon films, and we’re learning its properties, but we are still in the early stages of understanding how to manipulate it,” Narayan says. “We know a lot about diamond, so we can make diamond nanodots. We don’t yet know how to make Q-carbon nanodots or microneedles. That’s something we’re working on.”

NC State has filed two provisional patents on the Q-carbon and diamond creation techniques.

GaN Systems, a manufacturer of gallium nitride power transistors, announces that its foundry, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (TSMC), has expanded the high volume production of products based on GaN System’s proprietary Island Technology by 10X in response to surging global demand from consumer and enterprise customers. GaN Systems has the industry’s broadest and most comprehensive portfolio of GaN power transistors with both 100V and 650V GaN FETs shipping in volume.

Transistors based on GaN Systems’ Island Technology and using TSMC’s GaN fab process boast the best performance and Figure of Merit in the industry, easily outstripping the capabilities of the world’s highest performance silicon power semiconductors, the latest silicon carbide devices and competing gallium nitride products. The unique combination of TSMC’s gallium nitride process and GaN Systems’ proprietary Island Technology design is further enhanced by GaNPX packaging, which delivers high current handling, extremely low inductance and exceptional thermal performance. GaN Systems’ power switching transistors continue to lead the gallium nitride market, providing best-in-class 100V and 650V devices and driving product innovation ranging from thinner TVs to extended range electric vehicles.

Sajiv Dalal, VP Business Management at TSMC, comments, “We are delighted to confirm that our collaboration with GaN Systems has brought the promise of gallium nitride from concept through reliability testing and on to volume production.”

Adds Girvan Patterson, GaN Systems’ President, “GaN has emerged as the power semiconductor solution of choice. Smart mobile devices, slim TVs, games consoles, automotive systems and other mass volume items have been designed with GaN transistors as the enabling power technology, so it is imperative that devices are available in correspondingly large quantities. Using our patented Island Technology, we have designed and made available for widespread adoption GaN power solutions that greatly exceed the performance standards exhibited by silicon devices. That is why, after three years of working together, we are so excited to formally announce our collaboration with TSMC, the world’s leading third-party semiconductor manufacturing company and a byword for quality and service industry-wide.”

Delivering large volumes of highly reliable GaN transistors in near-chipscale packaging is the culmination of a journey GaN Systems began in 2008. The company was founded with the mission of creating a low cost, highly reliable GaN-on-Silicon product based on Island Technology, a method of creating small islands where electro-migration is mitigated, die size is minimized and very high current devices realized with high yield. Using Island Technology with TSMC’s GaN-on-Silicon manufacturing techniques enabled GaN Systems to deliver the most usable, high performance, normally-off transistor to the market in mid-2014. This has allowed global power system manufacturers in the energy storage, enterprise and consumer markets to design, develop, test and bring to market more powerful, lighter and far smaller new products in their quest to attain competitive edge. To meet customers’ increasing demand for high GaN volumes in 2016, TSMC’s commitment to volume production flow comes at the perfect time.

The European Commission has approved under the EU Merger Regulation the acquisition of Broadcom Corporation by Avago Technologies Limited. Both companies are global manufacturers of semiconductors. The Commission concluded that the merged entity would continue to face effective competition in Europe.

Commissioner Margrethe Vestager, in charge of competition policy, said: “Thanks to very good cooperation with the companies the Commission has been able to approve this multi-billion dollar takeover within a very short space of time while preserving effective competition in this crucial high-technology sector.”

The Commission’s investigation showed that the portfolios of the companies are mainly complementary since Broadcom makes “off-the-shelf” chips for the broadband and connectivity market segments, while Avago makes custom-built chips for special applications in the analog wireless integrated circuits, enterprise, storage and industrial segments.

Nevertheless, the Commission had some concerns about the vertical relationship created by the transaction, since Avago supplies certain intellectual property (technology for allowing fast data transmission between chips) to some of Broadcom’s competitors. The Commission’s concern was that after the takeover Avago could have had an incentive to withhold this intellectual property in order to extend the merged entity’s leading market position in the so-called “switch chips” market.

However, already during the Commission’s assessment of the case, Avago addressed these concerns by entering into commercial agreements with other “switch chip” manufacturers. These agreements will ensure that other “switch chip” manufacturers will continue to have access to the necessary intellectual property on reasonable terms. Thanks to this up-front solution, the Commission has been able to unconditionally clear the proposed transaction, which was notified on October 2, 2015.

Related news: 

Avago Technologies acquisition of Broadcom creates a new semiconductor powerhouse

Historic era of consolidation for chipmakers

Demand for LTPS TFT LCD shipments rose 30 percent in September 2015 to reach 51.6 million units, due to strong demand from Apple and Chinese brands. Total smartphone panel shipments grew 4 percent month over month to reach 160 million units in September 2015. While amorphous silicon (a-Si) thin-film transistor (TFT) liquid-crystal display (LCD) panels continue to lead the smartphone display market, low-temperature polysilicon (LTPS) TFT LCD panel shipment share is growing, according to IHS Inc., a of critical information and insight.

“TFT-LCD, based on a-Si substrate, has been the leading panel technology for mobile phones because it is easy to manufacture and costs less to produce than other display technologies. However, since Apple adopted LTPS for its popular iPhones, demand for the new technology has continued to increase,” said Brian Huh, senior analyst for IHS Technology. “While LTPS panels cost greater, they boast lower power consumption and higher resolution compared to a-Si LCD panels. Greater demand for higher definition screens, especially in China, has also increased the adoption of LTPS LCD mobile phone displays.”

Based on the latest information in the IHS Smartphone Display Shipment Trackerthe market share for the a-Si TFT LCD panel fell 10 percent month over month, but the panel still comprised the majority of smartphone display shipments, reaching 79.6 million in September 2015. Active-matrix organic light-emitting diode (AMOLED) panel shipments grew 7 percent to reach just 25 million units.

As a point of differentiation in the smartphone display market, Samsung Electronics adopted AMOLED-based LTPS displays in 2009. At that time Samsung Display was not looking to expand its customer base because Samsung Electronics digested almost all of the company’s AMOLED capacity. However as Samsung Electronics’ AMOLED smartphone business began to decline last year, Samsung Display has been expanding its customer lineup. “Since the end of last year, Samsung Display has been actively and aggressively promoting AMOLED displays to other electronics companies, especially in China, and AMOLED panel shipments for Chinese brands have increased remarkably since September,” Huh said.