Battery development may extend range of electric cars

It’s known that electric vehicles could travel longer distances before needing to charge and more renewable energy could be saved for a rainy day if lithium-sulfur batteries can just overcome a few technical hurdles. Now, a novel design for a critical part of the battery has been shown to significantly extend the technology’s lifespan, bringing it closer to commercial use.

A “hybrid” anode developed at the Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory could quadruple the life of lithium-sulfur batteries. Nature Communications published a paper today describing the anode’s design and performance.

“Lithium-sulfur batteries could one day help us take electric cars on longer drives and store renewable wind energy more cheaply, but some technical challenges have to be overcome first,” said PNNL Laboratory Fellow Jun Liu, who is the paper’s corresponding author. “PNNL’s new anode design is helping bringing us closer to that day.”

Today’s electric vehicles are commonly powered by rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, which are also being used to store renewable energy. But the chemistry of lithium-ion batteries limits how much energy they can store. One promising solution is the lithium-sulfur battery, which can hold as much as four times more energy per mass than lithium-ion batteries. This would enable electric vehicles to drive longer on a single charge and help store more renewable energy. The down side of lithium-sulfur batteries, however, is they have a much shorter lifespan because they can’t be charged as many times as lithium-ion batteries.

Most batteries have two electrodes: one is positively charged and called a cathode, while the second is negative and called an anode. Electricity is generated when electrons flow through a wire that connects the two. Meanwhile, charged molecules called ions shuffle from one electrode to the other through another path: the electrolyte solution in which the electrodes sit.

The lithium-sulfur battery’s main obstacles are unwanted side reactions that cut the battery’s life short. The undesirable action starts on the battery’s sulfur-containing cathode, which slowly disintegrates and forms molecules called polysulfides that dissolve into the battery’s electrolyte liquid. The dissolved sulfur eventually develops into a thin film called the solid-state electrolyte interface layer. The film forms on the surface of the lithium-containing anode, growing until the battery is inoperable.

Most lithium-sulfur battery research to date has centered on stopping sulfur leakage from the cathode. But PNNL researchers determined stopping that leakage can be particularly challenging. Besides, recent research has shown a battery with a dissolved cathode can still work. So the PNNL team focused on the battery’s other side by adding a protective shield to the anode.

The new shield is made of graphite, a thin matrix of connected carbon molecules that is already used in lithium-ion battery anodes. In a lithium-sulfur battery, PNNL’s graphite shield moves the sulfur side reactions away from the anode’s lithium surface, preventing it from growing the debilitating interference layer. Combining graphite from lithium-ion batteries with lithium from conventional lithium-sulfur batteries, the researchers dubbed their new anode a hybrid of the two.

The new anode quadrupled the lifespan of the lithium-sulfur battery system the PNNL team tested. When equipped with a conventional anode, the battery stopped working after about 100 charge-and-discharge cycles. But the system worked well past 400 cycles when it used PNNL’s hybrid anode and was tested under the same conditions.

“Sulfur is still dissolved in a lithium-sulfur battery that uses our hybrid anode, but that doesn’t really matter,” Liu said. “Tests showed a battery with a hybrid anode can successfully be charged repeatedly at a high rate for more 400 cycles, and with just an 11-percent decrease in the battery’s energy storage capacity.”

This and most other lithium-sulfur battery research is conducted with small, thin-film versions of the battery that are ideal for lab tests. Larger, thicker batteries would be needed to power electric cars and store renewable energy. Liu noted tests with a larger battery system would better evaluate the performance of PNNL’s new hybrid anode for real-world applications.


Easily post a comment below using your Linkedin, Twitter, Google or Facebook account. Comments won't automatically be posted to your social media accounts unless you select to share.

3 thoughts on “Battery development may extend range of electric cars

  1. R. E. Adams

    Here we go again ! What is this Fixation on ‘ Lithium ‘ anyway?! Lithium is only a single answer in the scheme of things when it comes to electrical energy storage! And, yes, Lithium batteries do Explode ! Try shorting a Lithium battery some time with a copper wire and tossing outside in the back yard and see what happens! We used to wind a copper wire on the old 9vdc Lithium batteries and toss them outside and watch them detonate like little hand grenades !

    One thing that keeps coming back to haunt Li batteries is the concept of storing Li +4 ions in a metalic matrix! Get Over it ! Its physically inefficient to do so! Take Magnesium for instance; ‘ One can store more +protons in the metal matrix of this element more densely than any other element other than Nickel ! Anybody remember; ‘ Nickel Metal Hydrid batteries ?!!!! Why are we trying to store Li ions when its far more plausible and efficient in storing +protons ?! How much Li salts are on the surface of the earth? A very small percentage and mostly are in Nations hostile to the USA! Magnesium? All over the place in all kinds of minerals and the Oceans are full of it!

    So here we are trying to push Li battery technology when there is far better alternatives ! Kind of reminds me of putting Eythanol Alcohol into gasoline to extend the mileage of gasoline powered vehicles when there are better and cheaper fuels like Meythanol that can be Nitro-ed for more energy! Than there is the Crazy Concept of Running Vehicles on pure Hydrogen just because only water comes out of the tail pipe !!! WTH is wrong with this concept?! Look at the Energy Conversion Path to obtain Hydrogen Gas !!! It just Ain’t Feasible Nor Efficient!

    OK folks; enough of my rationalizations, WTH Do You Think is the Best Route Here! I am doing my own experiments in my lab and shop and getting far better results than these so called Over Price, Government Funded Labs are ! regards, R. E. Adams, Ph.D, physicist –

  2. R. E. Adams

    BTW; R. E. Adams, Ph.D, physicist can be reached at a secure site of ‘ [email protected] ‘ , This is a SciTech Community eMail Facility ! – Where some two dozen or more Highly Intelligent People Converse On Everything !

  3. Peter

    I was stopped reading this sentence:
    “Most batteries have two electrodes: one is positively charged and called a cathode, while the second is negative and called an anode. ” … Really?!

Comments are closed.