Tag Archives: We Recommend

August 20, 2012 — OSRAM AG and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. have reached an agreement to settle all patent suits between them worldwide. The patent suits have been filed in various countries, including Germany, South Korea and in the United States of America. The parties will dismiss all suits as expeditiously as possible, with a settlement consequently expected to be finalized by the end of August. As part of the settlement, the parties have reached license agreements for their respective light-emitting diode (LED) patent portfolios. The parties have also signed a separate memorandum of understanding to explore the possibilities of jointly developing future LED-based products.

“We are glad to enter with Samsung in a new area of partnership-based competition. We respect the intellectual property rights of other companies and it is our ongoing policy to reach license agreements with other manufacturers of LED products. Along these lines, we appreciate this out-of-court settlement with Samsung,” said Wolfgang Dehen, CEO of OSRAM AG.

 “With the patent suits now behind us, we look forward to building a strategic relationship with OSRAM on a number of different fronts. There is a great deal of respect and also competition between the two companies. We believe the two companies now have an opportunity to significantly contribute to the LED industry and offer better products to our customers,” said Namseong Cho, Executive VP and General Manager of Samsung Electronics’ LED Business.

OSRAM AG (Munich, Germany) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Siemens AG and one of the two leading light manufacturers in the world. In fiscal year 2011 (ended September 30, 2011), it generated revenue of about 5 billion Euros. Osram is a high-tech company in the lighting sector and more than 70 percent of its revenue comes from energy efficient products. The company, which is very much internationally oriented, has around 41,000 employees worldwide, supplying customers in 150 countries from its 44 production sites in 16 countries (as of September 30, 2011). Additional information can be found in the internet at www.osram.com.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is a global leader in semiconductor, telecommunication, digital media and digital convergence technologies with 2011 consolidated sales of US$143.1 billion. Employing approximately 206,000 people in 197 offices across 72 countries, the company operates two separate organizations to coordinate its nine independent business units: Digital Media & Communications, comprising Visual Display, Mobile Communications, Telecommunication Systems, Digital Appliances, IT Solutions, and Digital Imaging; and Device Solutions, consisting of Memory, System LSI and LED. Recognized for its industry-leading performance across a range of economic, environmental and social criteria, Samsung Electronics was named the world’s most sustainable technology company in the 2011 Dow Jones Sustainability Index. For more information, please visit www.samsung.com.

Visit the LED Manufacturing Channel on Solid State Technology and subscribe to the LED Manufacturing News monthly e-newsletter!

August 20, 2012 — With growing demands from smart phones, tablets and other applications, combined with the Taiwan’s developing foundry and device industry, the region has become the center of many important developments in micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS) technology. To meet the needs of the booming MEMS market, Taiwan has built a comprehensive supply chain and plays a critical role in the MEMS industry. SEMICON Taiwan 2012, held September 5-7 at the Nangang Exhibition Hall, will feature both Taiwan MEMS suppliers and global MEMS elites — including Asia Pacific Microsystems, Freescale, InvenSense, and STMicroelectronics — who will discuss innovation in MEMS design, manufacture, packaging, testing and equipment.

More on SEMICON Taiwan: SEMICON Taiwan to spotlight growing market opps in Taiwan and Second annual SiP Global Summit

The latest Yole Développement market research report pointed out MEMS reached a size of US$ 10 billion in 2011, a growth of 17 percent. The industry is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 13 percent over the next few years to reach $20 billion by 2017. Market research firm IC Insights reported that embedded applications including accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetic sensors and other IC-based sensors will see CAGR of 18 percent before 2016, indicating a bright future for the MEMS industry.

"In addition to the demands from the consumer market, MEMS has applications in other arenas including manufacturing, medicine, energy, optic communications and air defense," said Terry Tsao, president of SEMI Taiwan and Southeast Asia. "To meet these niche markets mentioned above, this year SEMICON Taiwan, along with related local and international companies, will showcase MEMS Pavilion, MEMS Forum, MEMS Innovative Technology Center, and University MEMS Research. The goal is to boost Taiwan’s MEMS industry, make inroads into the international market, and capitalize on the technology’s growth."

The SEMICON Taiwan 2012 MEMS Pavilion, organized by SEMI and the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) and co-organized by the Nanotechnology and Micro System Association, will feature Asia Pacific Microsystems, Ardic Instruments and Keyence, among others, and display the most advanced MEMS technology and solutions. In addition, to strengthen industry-academic collaboration, SEMI is organizing a University MEMS Research area showcasing the latest from academic institutions.

The MEMS Forum held on September 6 will be co-hosted by Min-Shyong Lin, honorary chairman and founder of Asia Pacific Microsystems; Chih-Kung Lee, president of Institute for Information Industry; and Robert Tsai, director of TSMC MEMS Program.  In the morning session, Jean-Christophe Eloy, president and CEO of Yole Développement, will speak on MEMS industry trends and outlook; Steve Nasiri, chairman, CEO and founder of InvenSense, will address tracking systems; Benedetto Vigna, MEMS group executive vice president and general manager of STMicroelectronics, will speak on mobile applications; Stéphane Gervais-Ducouret, Global Marketing director for Sensors at Freescale, will talk about MEMS at all levels; and Heinz Ru, vice president of Marketing and Innovation at Tong Hsing Electronic Industries, will focus on MEMS packaging.

In the afternoon session, Yii-Tay Chiou, Cloud Service Application Center executive assistant at  ITRI, will introduce MEMS applications in personal care; Chii-Wann Lin, professor of National Taiwan University, will discuss MEMS applications in biotech; Markus Wimplinger, Technology Development and IP director at EVG will speak on mobile applications from a manufacturing perspective; Michael Hornung, technical marketing manager of SUSS MicroTec and Andreas Bursian, product manager of Multitest, will address challenges in MEMS production and testing respectively.

Register SEMICON Taiwan 2012 at: www.semicontaiwan.org. SEMI is a global industry association serving the nano- and microelectronics manufacturing supply chains. For more information on SEMI, visit www.semi.org.

Visit the MEMS Channel of Solid State Technology, and subscribe to our MEMS Direct e-newsletter!

August 17, 2012 — Barclays Capital provides its analysis of Apple iPhone 5 display manufacturing — will the phone’s display suppliers be able to achieve acceptable yields and throughput on the new in-cell architecture?

iPhone 5 builds were delayed and smaller-than-expected during Q3 2012, due to yield issues with the new in-cell touchscreen architecture. On top of this, the touch panel display industry is up against low profit margins and increased competition for business, according to a recent report.

"Over the next few years, in-cell, on-cell, and sensor-on-cover touch technologies will surpass the add-on type projected capacitive touch," according to Jennifer Colegrove, PhD, Vice President of Emerging Display Technologies at NPD DisplaySearch. However, today, in-cell display is the key bottleneck of iPhone 5 production. Barclays sees both LG Display (LGD) and Japan Display (JDI) likely to start small-scale volume production in August, with full-scale ramp-up in September. However, uncertainties remain regarding Sharp’s execution. Will Sharp be able to execute as required for full scale of iPhone-5-related memory demand?

The capacity of each panel maker (LGD, JDI, Sharp) is estimated at around 7 million units of the touchscreens per month, with an initial yield ratio around 80%. Expect an additional yield loss of about 10-20% at the final assembly process. Given this, Barclays estimates iPhone 5 production could reach around 15 million units in Q3 and 45 million units in Q4. Any kind of potential miss in execution at panel makers could result in lower-than-expected iPhone 5 production for the rest of the year.

Also read: Apple’s iPhone 5: Implications for the semiconductor supply chain

Visit our new Displays Manufacturing Channel on Solid State Technology and subscribe to our Displays Digest e-newsletter!

August 17, 2012 — North America-based manufacturers of semiconductor equipment posted $1.28 billion in orders and $1.48 billion in billings worldwide in July 2012, ending with a book-to-bill ratio of 0.87, says SEMI.

The three-month average of worldwide bookings in July 2012 of $1.28 billion is 10.2% lower than the final June 2012 level of $1.42 billion, and 1.5% lower than the July 2011 order level of $1.30 billion.

The three-month average of worldwide billings in July 2012, $1.48 billion, is 3.9% lower than the final June 2012 level of $1.54 billion, and 2.9% less than the July 2011 billings level of $1.52 billion.

"Bookings and billings for North American semiconductor equipment in July are close to values reported exactly one year ago," said Denny McGuirk, president and CEO of SEMI. "Seasonal slowing of investment activity in the current cycle is reflected in reduced orders as the industry enters the second half of the year."

The SEMI book-to-bill is a ratio of three-month moving averages of worldwide bookings and billings for North American-based semiconductor equipment manufacturers. A book-to-bill of 0.87 means that $87 worth of orders were received for every $100 of product billed for the month.

 

Billings
(3-mo. avg, $M)

Bookings
(3-mo. Avg, $M)

Book-to-
Bill

Feb 2012

1,322.8

1,336.9

1.01

March 2012

1,287.6

1,445.7

1.12

April 2012  

1,458.7

1,602.8

1.10

May 2012

1,539.3

1,613.7

1.05

June 2012 (final)

1,535.7

1,424.3

0.93

July 2012 (prelim)

1,476.5

1,278.7

0.87

The data contained in this release were compiled by David Powell, Inc., an independent financial services firm, without audit, from data submitted directly by the participants. SEMI and David Powell, Inc. assume no responsibility for the accuracy of the underlying data.

The data are contained in a monthly Book-to-Bill Report published by SEMI. The report tracks billings and bookings worldwide of North American-headquartered manufacturers of equipment used to manufacture semiconductor devices, not billings and bookings of the chips themselves. The Book-to-Bill report is one of three reports included with the Equipment Market Data Subscription (EMDS). SEMI is a global industry association serving the nano- and micro-electronic manufacturing supply chains. For more information, visit www.semi.org.

Visit the Semiconductors Channel of Solid State Technology!

August 15, 2012 — Apple Inc. is expected to release the iPhone 5 this fall. FBR Capital Markets says the smartphone could be “one of the most important catalysts for the overall chip manufacturers and service providers, as well as competitors in the handset space.”

The iPhone 5 could sell as many as 250 million units, representing one of the largest single product opportunities in Apple’s history.

What will the iPhone 5 mean for semiconductor suppliers? Incremental winners could include Qualcomm Inc. (NASDAQ:QCOM) and Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (NYSE:FCS); NXP Semiconductors (NASDAQ:NXPI) could be exposed, as well as Wolfson Micro.

Qualcom could see its baseband content grow from about $8 in the iPhone 4S to $15−$18 in the iPhone 5, as Apple upgrades to a 4G LTE slim baseband modem, FBR reports. This could drive 19% of annual sales at Qualcomm’s semiconductor unit, QCT. Fairchild Semi could enjoy increasing analog and FET content in the handset, and growing AC/DC content in the device charger. Wolfson Micro could see gains from the new 19-pin connector dock. NXP Semiconductor would benefit if Apple chose to include NFC functionality.

 Device content "maintainers" likely include many of the firms supplying into the iPhone 4S: Broadcom, Avago, Skyworks, Triquint, Cirrus, TI, ON Semi, and others.

FBR does not expect 28nm baseband shortages to affect the iPhone 5 launch; however, there are risks that new in-cell touchscreen display technology could limit initial device builds while in-cell yields are low.

View the full report from FBR Capital Markets’ Craig Berger CFA, CPA; David Dixon; and Scott Thompson at bit.ly/Pp11ux.

Visit the Semiconductors Channel of Solid State Technology!

August 14, 2012 — Worldwide silicon wafer area shipments for semiconductors increased during Q2 2012, compared to Q1 and to Q2 2011, reports SEMI’s Silicon Manufacturers Group (SMG).

Total silicon wafer area shipments were 2,447 million square inches (MSI) in Q2, up 20% from the 2,033 million square inches shipped during Q1. The shipment figure edged out Q2 2011 numbers, up 2% year over year.

The sequential and annual growth was expected, said Dr. Bruce Kellerman, chairman of SEMI SMG and senior director of Semiconductor Product Marketing at MEMC. "Given the ongoing market uncertainties and challenges, the overall wafer demand for 2012 is expected to be relatively flat compared to 2011."

Read SEMI News and Views’ latest post: Supply chain readiness in an era of accelerated change

Table. Quarterly silicon area shipment trends. Shipments are for semiconductor applications only and do not include solar applications.

 

Million of Square Inches (MSI)

Q2 2011

Q1 2012

Q2 2012

TOTAL

2,393

2,033

2,447

Silicon wafers are the fundamental building material for semiconductors. All data cited in this release is inclusive of polished silicon wafers, including virgin test wafers, epitaxial silicon wafers, and non-polished silicon wafers shipped by the wafer manufacturers to the end-users.

The Silicon Manufacturers Group acts as an independent special interest group within the SEMI structure and is open to SEMI members involved in manufacturing polycrystalline silicon, monocrystalline silicon or silicon wafers (e.g., as cut, polished, epi, etc.). The purpose of the group is to facilitate collective efforts on issues related to the silicon industry including the development of market information and statistics about the silicon industry and the semiconductor market. SEMI is a global industry association serving the nano- and microelectronics manufacturing supply chains. For more information on SEMI, visit www.semi.org.

Visit the Semiconductors Channel of Solid State Technology!

Tokyo Electron Limited (TSE: 8035) and FSI International, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSII), entered into a definitive agreement under which TEL will acquire FSI for $6.20 per share in cash, or an aggregate equity purchase price of approximately $252.5 million. This marks further consolidation in the wafer cleaning/surface preparation equipment market, following Applied Materials’ acquisition of Semitool in 2009 and Lam Research’s acquisition of SEZ in 2007.

FSI, a provider of cleaning and surface preparation equipment, has process capabilities complementary to TEL’s. Surface preparation has increasingly become a critical technology in semiconductor manufacturing, and TEL is focused on improving its market position.

Hiroshi Takenaka, President and CEO of TEL, commented: “FSI has a long history as a technology innovator in surface preparation. They have repeatedly developed creative solutions to key challenges in semiconductor manufacturing. I’m convinced that the acquisition will expand TEL’s business by strengthening our ability to provide effective solutions for the full range of current and future customer applications, thereby increasing value to our shareholders.”

Donald Mitchell, Chairman and CEO of FSI, added: "This transaction represents a compelling opportunity for FSI shareholders, employees and customers. By combining the market position, scale and operational excellence of Tokyo Electron with the leading edge surface preparation solutions from FSI, we can ensure that semiconductor manufacturers have access to the advanced technology they need for success at 28 nanometers and below. We are pleased to become part of Tokyo Electron, a premier company in the semiconductor production equipment industry.”

The purchase price represents a premium of 53.5% to the closing price of FSI’s common shares on August 10, 2012. The acquisition, which will be completed pursuant to a cash tender offer followed by a second step merger, has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of TEL and FSI. The board of directors of FSI unanimously recommends that FSI’s shareholders tender their shares into the tender offer. The transaction is expected to close in calendar year 2012.

Under the terms of the definitive merger agreement between TEL and FSI, TEL, through an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, will commence a cash tender offer to purchase all of the outstanding shares of FSI’s common stock for $6.20 per share. The closing of the tender offer is subject to customary terms and conditions, including the tender of a number of shares that constitutes at least a majority of FSI’s outstanding shares of common stock, on a fully diluted basis, and receipt of required regulatory approvals, including expiration or termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act. The agreement also provides for the parties to effect, subject to customary conditions, a merger following the completion of the tender offer that would result in all shares not tendered in the tender offer being converted into the right to receive $6.20 per share in cash. TEL will finance the acquisition from its existing cash resources.

Goldman Sachs is serving as exclusive financial adviser to Tokyo Electron in connection with the acquisition, and Jones Day is its legal adviser. Barclays is serving as exclusive financial adviser to FSI in connection with the acquisition, and Faegre Baker Daniels LLP is its legal adviser.

August 13, 2012 — Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. remained the two largest buyers of micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS) devices for consumer and mobile applications in 2011, solidifying their command and expanding their influence over the market, according to an IHS iSuppli MEMS Market Tracker report.

Apple and Samsung combined bought 37% of the consumer and mobile MEMS devices in 2011, mainly on the strength of their smartphones and tablets integrating MEMS devices like accelerometers, gyroscopes, MEMS microphones and bulk acoustic wave (BAW) filters.

Top 10 Buyers of Consumer & Mobile MEMS Devices Ranked by Expenditures (in Billions of US Dollars)

Company

2011

2010

Apple

$499.8

$209.2

Samsung

$291.3

$201.2

LG Electronics

$91.7

$100.9

Sony

$85.4

$100.4

Nintendo

$81.8

$124.6

Nokia

$76.5

$79.2

HTC

$57.6

$34.5

Motorola

$44.8

$38.1

Canon

$32.3

$32.1

Sony Ericsson

$32.3

$42.0

Others

$824.3

$677.8

Total

$2,117.8

$1,640.0

Source: IHS iSuppli Research, August 2012

 

Apple, the top buyer, made MEMS purchases equivalent to $499.8 million, or roughly 23%, of the $2.1 billion consumer and mobile MEMS market. Samsung, in second place, was worth $291.3 million to the industry, or 14%. Apple’s total last year was up 139% from $209.2 million in 2010, while Samsung’s MEMS expenditure was up 45% from $201.2 million for the same period.

“The dominance of Apple and Samsung is due in to their successful smartphone and tablet offerings, which contrast dramatically with other Top 10 buyers who do not share the same level of success in either product offering or both,” said Jérémie Bouchaud, director and senior principal analyst for MEMS & sensors at IHS. “In the smartphone market, for instance, Apple’s iPhone is a category killer, while Samsung’s various smartphone models collectively enjoy massive share. Apple’s lead in the tablet space is formidable given the unmatched dominance of the iPad. While Samsung’s unit share of the tablet market still hovers around 10%, its success in the smartphone market coupled with its technological and marketing prowess position Samsung as one of the strongest potential challengers to Apple’s long-term dominance in tablets.”

With the overall consumer and mobile MEMS market continuing to grow because of smartphones and tablets, and given that both Apple and Samsung are the principal players in those product lines, the two companies are in no danger of seeing their influence wane for at least a few more years, IHS believes.

The size of both Apple and Samsung was such that none of the eight companies making up the Top 10 last year individually contributed more than $100 million to the overall consumer and mobile MEMS space. The rest of the Top 10 included LG Electronics, Sony Corp., Nintendo Co. Ltd., Nokia Corp., HTC Corp., Motorola Inc., Canon Inc. and the now-dissolved Sony Ericsson.

The purchasing landscape for consumer and mobile MEMS changed with the arrival of mobile handsets—especially smartphones—and tablets. The two popular consumer electronics devices combined accounted for 60% in value of the consumer and mobile MEMS market in 2011, and their share is projected to reach an even higher 67% by 2016. In contrast to the new-found prominence of handsets and tablets,

gaming is no longer as important compared to that segment’s primacy in 2007, when Nintendo reigned as the top buyer for consumer and mobile MEMS.

Beyond influencing the market share of suppliers, the authoritative presence of Apple and Samsung also gives them incredible purchasing power and outsized negotiating power. As a result, they command different prices than the rest of the industry, with both companies paying significantly less for accelerometers and gyroscopes. Apple and Samsung currently spend 20 to 25% less on accelerometers than other handset makers, and 10 to 15% less on gyroscopes.

Such low prices are a hurdle for companies trying to win designs with the two giants. Failing that, MEMS suppliers do business instead with other manufacturers. In so doing, these suppliers are able to command better prices than if they dealt with Apple and Samsung, but choosing to supply other partners besides the two majors also means being resigned to much smaller sales volumes.

The combined weight of Apple and Samsung in the consumer and mobile MEMS market translates into palpable advantages for both. Conversely, the MEMS suppliers must make concessions in order to accommodate the giants’ heft.

For instance, suppliers know that they can only hope to win significant share by catering to at least one of the two behemoths. Otherwise, one contends with crumbs and is saddled with middling sales volumes unsuitable for large-scale market competition.

By all accounts, winning business from Samsung is easier than securing sales from Apple. Consistent with Samsung’s approach to be many things to many people, Samsung uses multiple MEMS suppliers even for the same handset platform. Bosch of Germany, French-Italian STMicroelectronics and New York-based Kionix all supply accelerometers to the South Korean electronics giant, while InvenSense from California and STMicroelectronics supply Samsung with gyroscopes. Illinois-based Knowles Electronics was the sole trusted supplier of MEMS microphone to Samsung for some time, but Goertek from China has made inroads into Samsung cellphones this year.

Supplying into Apple is more challenging. Until now, the firm has stayed loyal to STMicroelectronics for the supply of accelerometers and gyroscopes to the iPhone and iPad. Apple, in turn, accounted for roughly half of the MEMS sales of STMicroelectronics last year. There is no indication that Apple will switch suppliers anytime soon, even though other manufacturers have yearned to be let in. But Apple has also slightly widened its pool of suppliers in the last year or so. Already, it uses U.S. entity Knowles and AAC of China for MEMS microphones in the iPhone 4 and 4S; Analog Devices Inc. of Massachusetts for the iPod nano 5th as well as the iPad 2; and AAC again for the new iPad.
IHS (NYSE: IHS) is the leading source of information and insight in critical areas that shape today’s business landscape, including energy and power; design and supply chain; defense, risk and security; environmental, health and safety (EHS) and sustainability; country and industry forecasting; and commodities, pricing and cost. Learn more at www.ihs.com.

Visit the MEMS Channel of Solid State Technology, and subscribe to our MEMS Direct e-newsletter!

Karen Savala, president, SEMI Americas

August 10, 2012 — This year at the SEMICON West press conference, I presented on “Supply Chain Readiness in an Era of Accelerated Change” and I’d like to summarize that presentation for you.  The talk centered on the increasing capital and technology requirements of advanced semiconductor production and the pressures this creates on the supply chain. The structure of the industry is rapidly changing — and how it will respond to the simultaneous challenges of Moore’s Law scaling, 450mm wafer production, 3D-ICs, and industry consolidation is very much unknown.   Much of this uncertainty is reflected in what we call “supply chain readiness.”

Never before has the industry faced greater economic and technological uncertainty. The industry is consolidating, with fewer leading edge chip makers and fewer leading edge suppliers.  The technical challenges are increasing as geometric scaling and Moore’s Law now must be accomplished with rising process engineering complexity — particularly in the areas of EUV lithography, 3D-IC chip packages and 450mm wafers.

The economic and technical challenges of today’s environment will have an impact on supply chain readiness.  In the past, the size and scope of the industry supported a vibrant supply chain of start-ups, innovators at the leading edge, brilliant fast-followers, and a variety of technology and process specialists. 

Today, the supply chain is dominated by several large OEM companies who rely upon a global ecosystem of technology subsystem and component firms.  As process engineering becomes more complex at leading-edge nodes, the readiness of the supply chain to deliver advanced, integrated solutions becomes less certain.

 

EUV Lithography

Photolithography systems are among the most complex and expensive machines on the planet.  They are also the most important tool to maintain the pace of Moore’s Law.  From advanced light sources from Cymer to highly engineered optics and lenses from Carl Zeiss, approximately 90% of an ASML lithography system comes from external suppliers. EUV systems are currently shipping, but as you know, they do not meet the required wafers-per-hour throughout for high-volume production.  Consequently, EUV is being deployed in conjunction with immersion lithography, directed assembly and other options. The node at which EUV fully enters mass production is still uncertain — certainly below 20nm, perhaps at the 16 nm node, possibly at 8nm.

To alleviate some of this uncertainty, both Intel and TSMC have made significant investments in ASML to support EUV development and help accelerate the introduction of 450mm systems.  While this massive infusion of cash will assure a common mission between these key industry players, how it will impact next generation mask infrastructure has yet to be seen.

In mask readiness, EUV mask blanks are an order of magnitude more complex than today’s conventional mask blanks.  Spectacular work has been accomplished to improve yield and reduce defects on these new systems.

Today, according to SEMATECH, mask performance is sufficient to meet the needs of memory, but still short on meeting the requirements for logic.  More importantly, as this chart shows, you’ll see that a significant gap between EUV mask blank demand and supply capacity currently exists.  Uncertain EUV insertion will make investment difficult for suppliers to address this capacity shortfall before full production is assured.  This uncertainty may also threaten production volume availability for EUV resists.

 

 

3D-IC

3D-IC is another area of dramatic and uncertain change lies in the area of 3D-IC stacked chips.  Given their potential for smaller form factors, increased performance, and reduced cost and power consumption, 3D-IC technologies are now enabling the next generation of advanced semiconductor packaging.  Already, 2.5D approaches using silicon interposers to provide wide IO bandwidth and denser packaging have been introduced, but many manufacturing and collaboration barriers remain before widespread commercialization. 

3D integration using through-silicon vias promise a fundamental shift for current multi-chip integration and packaging approaches.  But cost-effective, high-volume manufacturing will be difficult to achieve without standardized equipment, mat䁥rials, and processes.

With many advanced packaging processes taking place on the semiconductor wafer, the traditional supply chain of “front-end fab at the foundry” and “back-end fab at the packaging and test house” is at risk of falling apart. TSMC has been clear about their vision. They want an   expanded role in the industry to implement — not just wafer foundry services — but 3D integration as well, including thinning, bumping and assembly.

While the business models sort themselves out, there remain technology challenges and process flow uncertainty.  Chips-on-substrate, chips-on-wafer and chip-on-chip all remain viable options. 

Currently, there are no collaboration models to solve this foundry-OSAT-IDM and fabless chip matrix for complex, multi-chip packages.  SEMI standards are addressing many supply chain, equipment and materials issues. However, market demand and business models must continue to sort themselves out before 3D chip stacking can widely penetrate the industry.

 

450mm Wafer Transition

The most expensive semiconductor industry technology transition in history will occur with the transition to 450mm wafers.  R&D costs alone are estimated to rise between $8 and $40 billion, depending on the efficiency with which the transition is coordinated.  The high end of this estimate represents a level of investment that is equivalent to what the entire industry spent on advanced process development over the past five years.  These costs will be incurred concurrently with other major technical challenges in the industry, including the move to 3D transistor structures, and EUV and 3D stacked chips already mentioned. The recent investments in ASML by Intel and TSMC reflect just how much the industry will be changed by 450mm development requirements. 

Currently, the Global 450 Consortium, or G450C, with members from Intel, IBM, Global Foundries, TSMC, and Samsung, is in the process of constructing and equipping a 450 pilot line in New York.  G450C has said that it expects the line to complete by mid- 2013 to early 2014. The business model to equip this pilot line is unlike anything we’ve seen before — in this industry or elsewhere!  The pilot line will feature approximately 50 tool types, most if not all, from no more than two vendors.  Performance data from this pilot line will be used to qualify equipment purchases for high-volume production equipment.  To many, it is clear that to participate in future 450mm production, equipment suppliers must participate in the pilot line.

However, not all vendors are being asked to participate, and for those that do, the terms for participation in the pilot line are daunting.  How the industry will pay for and recover the massive R&D cost has not been resolved.  Suppliers must weigh a decision to participate in pilot line development in conjunction with the possibility of not being qualified for production equipment orders from the world’s top chip manufacturers.  The timing and quantity of these of these potential future orders are also not known. 

These are difficult and complicated negotiations and decisions for the industry’s leading OEMs.  They are even more complicated and difficult for the remainder of the supply chain. 

While our leading equipment suppliers must sell products and services to chip manufacturers, many of the component and subsystem suppliers do not; they often serve multiple industries. 

As the current collaboration model unfolds for 450mm development, its impact on a variety of technology suppliers — many of them exhibitors at SEMICON West — is uncertain. Approximately 90% of ASML’s components and subsystems are provided by outside suppliers.  Another example, Applied Materials is dependent on 800 suppliers worldwide, with 75 prime strategic suppliers representing 80 percent of their annual procurement allocation. 

On the transition of the industry to 450mm wafers — it is certain that the impact on the supply chain will be disruptive and significant. While it appears that G450C may be the primary path of coordination for the scale-up of wafer process tools, it is the OEMs that will be coordinating a complex multi-layered supply chain of component and sub-assembly providers.  At SEMICON West for the first time, the major process tool makers communicated requirements and expectations to the larger group of supply chain participants that may not have direct access to the consortia pilot line.

 

SEMICON West 2012

At SEMICON West, the most knowledgeable and authoritative voices in the industry discussed these tough issues.  Our objective is advance the dialog — to convey useful information to our attendees — and to serve as a platform for productive collaboration on these and other industry issues.  All of the events at SEMICON West (keynotes, partner events, TechXPOTs, and technical presentations) allow key industry stakeholders to discuss where it makes sense to collaborate — and where it’s best to compete.

 

Please let me know if you have comments or questions at [email protected].

 

Karen Savala

SEMI

www.semi.org

August 8, 2012 — The light-emitting diode (LED) industry is entering its third growth cycle, general lighting, according to Yole Développement and EPIC’s report, “Status of the LED Industry.” However, the cost of a packaged LED still needs to be reduced by a factor x10 to enable massive adoption. New business models are mandatory to capture added value of LED lighting.

Growth of the LED industry has come initially from the small display application and has been driven forward by LCD applications. LED TV was expected to be the LED industry driver for 2011 but the reality was quite different. Lower adoption of LEDs in the TV market and the entry of several new players, mostly from Asia, created a climate of overcapacity, price pressure and strong competition. As a consequence, packaged LED volume was about 30% lower than expected and revenue shrank due to strong ASP pressure.

Figure. Packaged LED revenue, by application. SOURCE: Yole, Status of the LED Industry, August 2012.

Yole and EPIC estimate packaged LED revenue will reach a market size of $11.4 billion in 2012 and will peak to $17.1 billion by 2018. Growth will be driven both by the display (LCD TV) and general lighting applications until massive adoption of LEDs in lighting.

From 2014, the third growth cycle of the LED business will accelerate with the general lighting application representing more than 50% of the overall packaged LED business. In terms of volume, LED die surface will increase from 22.5 billion mm² (2012) to 80 billion mm² (2018). This will prompt substrate volume growth from 8 million x 2” wafer equivalent (TIE) in 2011 to 39.5 million TIE in 2018, with a CAGR of 26%.

The adoption of LEDs for general lighting applications strongly depends on technology and manufacturing improvements, improving performance and cost to hit an LED adoption trigger point. Industry consensus points out a cost reduction per lumen of packaged LEDs by a factor x10. This can be achieved through a combination of manufacturing efficiency and performance improvement, such as access to larger size wafers, improvements in LED epitaxy cost of ownership through yield and throughput, and improved packaging technologies (phosphors, optics, etc).

Additionally, improved package and luminaire design will also enable significant cost reduction.

Ultimately, the long life of solid state lighting (SSL) technology will totally change the lighting market by dramatically increasing the length of the replacement cycles. The replacement market (aftermarket) will be strongly impacted, pushing traditional players of the lighting industry to define new strategies to capture profit (intelligent lighting, lighting solutions, etc).

“In addition, as value is moving to the top of the value chain (module and luminaire levels), several players that were originally involved only at LED device levels will develop strategies of vertical integration in order to capture more value,” added Tom Pearsall, general secretary, EPIC. But accessing distribution channels represents a big challenge for those players who develop new approaches to sell their lighting products (e-commerce, new distributors). The rise of LED lighting will therefore depend on the right merger of the emerging LED industry with the traditional lighting industry.

The researchers also found that China’s GaN MOCVD reactor capacity has increased by a factor of 20 in the last 3 years. The capacity for GaN LED epitaxy has increased dramatically in 2010 and 2011. This increase took place across all regions but was most dramatic in China (increased by a factor x20 of the reactor capacity between Q4 2009 and Q1 2012).

“Most emerging Chinese LED epiwafer and die manufacturers are still lagging significantly behind their competitors in term of technology maturity and LED performance,” says Dr Eric Virey, senior analyst, LED at Yole Développement.

The bulk of those new companies are not yet capable of manufacturing LEDs to address the large display and general lighting applications that are currently driving the market. In the mid-term, consolidation of the Chinese LED industry will occur (scenario in the central government’s new five-year plan), and China should became a major actor in the LED industry.

The report presents all applications of LEDs and associated market metrics, LED cost reduction opportunities, entire LED value chain, a deep analysis of the general lighting application and an analysis of geographical trends. Authors include Pars Mukish, market and technology analyst and Dr Eric Virey, senior analyst at Yole Développement, amd Tom Pearsall, general secretary, EPIC.

Companies cited in the report: A-Bright, Advanced Photonics, American Bright, American Opto Plus, AOT, ApexScience & Engineering, APT Eelctronics, Aqualite Co, Arima, AUO, Avago, Bridgelux, Bright LED, Brightview electronic, CDT, Century Epitech, Chi Mei Lighting Technology, Citizen Electronics, CREE, CS Bright, Daina, Dominant Semiconductors, Edison, Elec-tech, Enfis, Epiled, Epilight Technology, Epistar, EpiValley, Everlight, Excellence Opto, Fangda group, Formosa epitaxy (Forepi), Galaxia Photonic, GE, Genesis Photonics, Golden Valley Optoelectronics, Hangzhou Silan Azure, Harvatech, HC SemiTek, Heesung, High Power Opto, Hi-Light, Hueyjann Huga, Huiyuan Optoelectronic, Hunan HuaLei Optoelectronic, Hunin Electronic, Idemitsu Kosan, Illumitex, Invenlux, Itswell, KingBright, Kodenshi, Konica Minolta, Korea Photonics Technology Institute (KOPTI), Kwality group, Lattice Power Corporation, LedEngin, LEDTech, Lemnis, Lextar/Lighthouse, LG Display, LG Innotek, Lighting Science, Ligitek, Lite-On, LongDeXin (LDX), Lumei Optoelectronics, Lumenmax, Lumex, Lumileds, LumiMicro, Lumination, Luminus, Lumitek, Lustrous Technology, Luxpia, LuxtalTek, MokSan Electronics, Moser Baer, Nanosys, Nanya, Nationstar, Neo-Neon, Nichia, NiNEX, Oasis, Optek Technology, Opto Tech, Osram, ParaLight, Philips, Power Opto, Powerlightec, Rainbow Optoelectronics, Rohm, Samsung SEMCO, Sanan Optoelectronics, Sanken Electric, Seiwa Electric, SemiLEDs, Seoul semi / Optodevice, Shandong Huaguang Optoelectronics, Sharp, Shenzen Mason Technology, Shenzen Mimgxue, Shenzen Yiliu Electronic, Shenzhen Refond, Showa Denko, Stanley Electric, Sunpu Opto, Supernova, Sylvania, Tekcore, TESS, Tonghui Electronic Corporation, Toshiba, Toyoda Gosei, TSMC, Tyntek, UDC, Unity Opto, Visera Tech, Vishay, VPEC, Walsin Lihwa, Wellipower, Wenrun Optoelectronic, Wooree LED, Xiamen Changelight, Xiamen Hualian, Ya Hsin, Yangzhou Huaxia Integrated Photoelectric (DarewinChip), Yangzhou Zhongke Semiconductor, YoungTeck, Yuti Lighting Shanghai, Zoomview (Xi An Zoomlight), and more.

Yole Développement is a group of companies providing market research, technology analysis, strategy consulting, media, and finance services. For more information, please visit www.yole.fr.

The European Photonics Industry Consortium, EPIC, has three important activities: dialogue with the European Commission, ownership of the European roadmap for photonic technologies, and developing the critical human resource of trained scientists and engineers in the European economic area. EPIC is composed of 80 member organizations and over 400 associate members. For more information: www.epic-assoc.com.

Visit the LED Manufacturing Channel on Solid State Technology and subscribe to the LED Manufacturing News monthly e-newsletter!