Tag Archives: letter-wafer-top

By Jay Chittooran

Last week, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), on instruction from President Trump, notified Congress that the administration intends to begin bilateral trade negotiations with Japan, the European Union (EU), and the United Kingdom.

SEMI stands strong for free trade and open markets, and roundly supports efforts to increase market access and tap into more foreign economies, especially economies like Japan and the EU, both of which are central to the semiconductor industry. The semiconductor industry, which enables the $2 trillion electronics market, is built on global commerce. SEMI members rely on a vast network of supply chains that span the globe, bringing together components and tools made all around the world and assembled into a single sub-system that is then integrated into a larger tool used in the chipmaking process.

These free trade agreements will reduce tariffs, which will result in cost savings and productivity gains, and allow SEMI members to expand and grow. But the benefits of modern free trade agreements extend well beyond tariff reduction. Indeed, these trade deals will establish and enhance global trade rules that enable companies to innovate and compete fairly on a level playing field. Trade agreements strengthen certainty and further business continuity.

While the exact nature and negotiation timelines for the talks remain unclear, SEMI will engage the administration, urging it to maintain high standards in these agreements, such as:

  • Maintain strong respect for intellectual property and trade secrets through robust safeguards and significant penalties for violators
  • Remove tariffs and non-tariff barriers on semiconductor products as well as products that depend on semiconductors
  • Simplify and harmonize the customs and trade facilitation processes
  • Combat any attempts of forced technology transfer
  • Prevent use of data localization measures and enable the free flow of cross-border data flows
  • End discriminatory and/or burdensome regulatory practices
  • Ensure standards in all forms are market-oriented
  • Create rules for state-owned enterprises to ensure fair and non-discriminatory treatment of all companies

According to Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), the U.S. law that guides trade votes in Congress, negotiations with each country can only begin 90 days after last week’s notification. During that period, there will be intensive consultation with Congress and stakeholders. This means, at the earliest, talks can start on January 14, 2019. (Bear in mind that discussions with the UK can only begin in earnest once the UK has formally left the European Union on March 29, 2019.)

The Trump administration’s announcement comes after the U.S. imposed or threatened tariffs on imports on all trading partners, including the EU and China. All told, the U.S. has imposed tariffs on more than $300 billion worth of goods. SEMI has weighed in on the detrimental nature of tariffs, arguing that tariffs on China will ultimately do nothing to address the concerns with China’s trade practices. This sledgehammer approach will introduce significant uncertainty, impose greater costs, and potentially lead to a trade war, ultimately undercutting the ability of semiconductor companies to sell overseas, stifling innovation and curbing U.S. technological leadership.

Elsewhere, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, the multilateral trade deal that links 11 Asia-Pacific economies, is well on its way to taking force. Canada will be taking its final steps to ratify the deal, joining Mexico, Japan and Singapore. The deal, formerly known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, should take effect by the first half of 2019.

SEMI will continue tracking ongoing trade developments. Any SEMI members with questions should contact Jay Chittooran, Public Policy Manager at SEMI, at [email protected].

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. today announced that it has completed all process technology development and has started wafer production of its revolutionary process node, 7LPP, the 7-nanometer (nm) LPP (Low Power Plus) with extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography technology. The introduction of 7LPP is a clear demonstration of Samsung Foundry’s technology roadmap evolution and provides customers with a definite path to 3nm.

Samsung’s newest EUV fab under construction in Hwaseong, South Korea (Photo: Business Wire)

The commercialization of its newest process node, 7LPP gives customers the ability to build a full range of exciting new products that will push the boundaries of applications such as 5G, Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise and Hyperscale Datacenter, IoT, Automotive, and Networking.

“With the introduction of its EUV process node, Samsung has led a quiet revolution in the semiconductor industry,” said Charlie Bae, executive vice president of foundry sales and marketing team at Samsung Electronics. “This fundamental shift in how wafers are manufactured gives our customers the opportunity to significantly improve their products’ time to market with superior throughput, reduced layers, and better yields. We’re confident that 7LPP will be an optimal choice not only for mobile and HPC, but also for a wide range of cutting-edge applications.”

The characteristics and benefits of EUV technology

EUV uses 13.5nm wavelength light to expose silicon wafers as opposed to conventional argon fluoride (ArF) immersion technologies that are only able to achieve 193nm wavelengths and require expensive multi-patterning mask sets. EUV enables the use of a single mask to create a silicon wafer layer where ArF can require up to 4 masks to create that same layer. Consequently Samsung’s 7LPP process can reduce the total number of masks by about 20% compared to non-EUV process, enabling customers to save time and cost.

The EUV lithography improvements also deliver increased performance, lower power and smaller area while improving design productivity by reducing multi-patterning complexity. Compared to its 10nm FinFET predecessors, Samsung’s 7LPP technology not only greatly reduces the process complexity with fewer layers and better yields, but also delivers up to a 40% increase in area efficiency with 20% higher performance or up to 50% lower power consumption.

The road to EUV technology

Since Samsung’s research and development in EUV began in the 2000s, the company has made outstanding progress through collaborative partnerships with industry-leading tool providers to design and install completely new equipment in its manufacturing facilities to ensure the stability of EUV wafers. The initial EUV production has started in Samsung’s S3 Fab in Hwaseong, Korea.

By 2020, Samsung expects to secure additional capacity with a new EUV line for customers who need high-volume manufacturing for next-generation chip designs. As an EUV pioneer, Samsung has also developed proprietary capabilities such as a unique mask inspection tool that performs early defect detection in EUV masks, allowing those defects to be eliminated early in the manufacturing cycle.

“Commercialization of EUV technology is a revolution for the semiconductor industry and will have a huge impact on our everyday lives,” said Peter Jenkins, vice president of corporate marketing at ASML. “It is our great pleasure to collaborate with Samsung and other leading chip makers on this fundamental shift in semiconductor process manufacturing.”

7nm LPP EUV Ecosystem

The Samsung Advanced Foundry Ecosystem™ is also fully prepared for the introduction of 7LPP with EUV. Ecosystem partners across the industry will be providing Foundation and Advanced IP, Advanced Packaging, and Services to fully enable Samsung customers to develop their products on this new platform. From high-performance and high-density standard cells to HBM2/2e memory interfaces and 112G SerDes interfaces, SAFE™ is ready to help customers implement their designs on 7LPP.

With tremendous growth of smartphones over the past decade, foundry sales to the communications market have soared and are now forecast to account for about 3x more than IC foundry sales to the computer market in 2018, based on IC Insights’ extensive part-two analysis of the integrated circuit foundry business in the September Update to The 2018 McClean Report (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Ten years ago, computers/computing systems were easily the largest application for pure-play IC foundry sales, but a relatively flat tablet PC market and lackluster desktop and notebook PC sales since 2011 contributed to weak pure-play foundry sales into the computer segment.

Now, new server applications targeting artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things, Cloud Computing, and cryptocurrency are forecast to breathe new life into this market segment over the next five years. TSMC expects its IC sales into the IoT segment will grow by a CAGR of more than 20% from 2017 through 2022 (the company had greater than $1.0 billion in IoT sales in 2017).

Although IC foundry sales for computer applications are expected to surge 41% this year (driven by TSMC’s cryptocurrency device sales), the communications foundry market is still expected to be about 3x the size of the computer segment in 2018.  The communications foundry market is forecast to display only a 2% growth rate in 2018, six points less than the total pure-play foundry market growth rate expected for this year.

Overall, the communications (52%), computer (19%), and consumer (13%) market segments are forecast to represent 84% of the pure-play IC foundry market in 2018.

Total wafer shipments in 2018 year are expected to eclipse the all-time market high set in 2017 and continue to reach record levels through 2021, according to SEMI’s recent semiconductor industry annual silicon shipment forecast. The forecast of demand for silicon units for the period 2018 through 2021 shows polished and epitaxial silicon shipments totaling 12,445 million square inches in 2018; 13,090 million square inches in 2019; 13,440 million square inches in 2020, and 13,778 million square inches in 2021 (see table below).

“As new greenfield fab projects continue to emerge for memory and foundry, silicon shipments are expected to remain strong for 2019 and through 2021,” said Clark Tseng, director of Industry Research & Statistics at SEMI. “Silicon demand will continue to grow as semiconductor content increases in mobile, high-performance computing, automotive, and Internet of Things applications.”

2018 Silicon* Shipment Forecast (MSI = Millions of Square Inches)

Actual
Forecast
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
MSI
10,577
11,617
12,445
13,090
13,440
13,778
Annual Growth
3.0%
9.8%
7.1%
5.2%
2.7%
2.5%

*Total Electronic Grade Silicon Slices – Excludes Non-Polished Wafers

*Shipments are for semiconductor applications only and do not include solar applications

Source: SEMI (www.semi.org), October 2018

Silicon wafers are the fundamental building material for semiconductors, which in turn, are vital components of virtually all electronics goods, including computers, telecommunications products, and consumer electronics. The highly engineered thin round disks are produced in various diameters (from one inch to 12 inches) and serve as the substrate material on which most semiconductor devices or chips are fabricated.

All data cited in this release is inclusive of polished silicon wafers, including virgin test wafers and epitaxial silicon wafers shipped by the wafer manufacturers to the end-users. Data do not include non-polished or reclaimed wafers.

The average revenue generated from processed wafers among the four biggest pure-play foundries (TSMC, GlobalFoundries, UMC, and SMIC) is expected to be $1,138 in 2018, when expressed in 200mm-equivalent wafers, which is essentially flat from $1,136 in 2017, according to a new analysis by IC Insights (Figure 1).  The average revenue per wafer among the Big 4 foundries peaked in 2014 at $1,149 and then slowly declined through last year, based on IC Insights’ extensive part-two analysis of the integrated circuit foundry business in the September Update to The 2018 McClean Report.

Figure 1

TSMC’s average revenue per wafer in 2018 is forecast to be $1,382, which is 36% higher than GlobalFoundries’ $1,014.  UMC’s average revenue per wafer in 2018 is expected to be only $715, about half of the projected amount at TSMC this year.  Furthermore, TSMC is the only foundry among the Big 4 that is expected to generate higher revenue per wafer (9% more) in 2018 than in 2013.  In contrast, GlobalFoundries, UMC, and SMIC’s 2018 revenue per wafer averages are forecast to decline by 1%, 10%, and 16%, respectively, compared to 2013.

Although the average revenue per wafer of the Big 4 foundries is forecast to be $1,138 this year, the amount generated is highly dependent upon the minimum feature size of the IC processing technology. Figure 2 shows the typical 2Q18 revenue per wafer for some of the major technology nodes and wafer sizes produced by pure-play foundries.  In 2Q18, there was more than a 16x difference between the 0.5µ 200mm revenue per wafer ($370) and the ≤20nm 300mm revenue per wafer ($6,050).  Even when using revenue per square inch, the difference is dramatic ($7.41 for the 0.5µ technology versus $53.86 for the ≤20nm technology).  Since TSMC gets such a large percentage of its sales from ≤45nm production, its revenue per wafer is expected to increase by a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2% from 2013 through 2018 as compared to a -2% CAGR for the total revenue per wafer average of GlobalFoundries, UMC, and SMIC during this same timeperiod.

Figure 2

There will probably be only three foundries able to offer high-volume leading-edge production over the next five years (i.e., TSMC, Samsung, and Intel).  IC Insights believes these companies are likely to be fierce competitors among themselves—especially TSMC and Samsung—and as a result, pricing will likely be under pressure through 2022.

By Serena Brischetto

SEMI met with Heinz Martin Esser, managing director at Fabmatics GmbH, to discuss how existing 200mm semiconductor fabs can master the challenges of a 24×7 production under highest cost and quality pressure by implementing intralogistics automation solutions. The two spoke ahead to his presentation at the Fab Management Forum at SEMICON Europa 2018, 13-16, November 2018, in Munich, Germany. To register for the event, click here.

SEMI: Looking at the latest production capacity data for 2018 – it is a 200mm fab boom. Growing demand for analog, MEMS and RF chips continues to cause acute shortages for both 200mm fab capacity and equipment. Do you think this trend will continue the next years or is it only a short term run on 200mm fabs?

Esser: We at Fabmatics believe in a long-term trend. The emergence of the Internet of Things and growing digitalization in all areas of life will continue to increase demand for integrated circuits (ASICs), analog ICs, high-performance components and micro-mechanical sensors (MEMS) in the coming years. Many of these semiconductor elements should be produced in 200 mm fabs.

SEMI: How does Fab automation contribute to increase capacity of existing, mature 200mm fabs?

Esser:  We are convinced that fab automation is one of the greatest potentials for older 200mm factories to effectively master increased demand, increasing efficiency, quality assurance and flexibility at the same time. In particular, material flow automation, which is often the missing link between existing equipment in different production areas, can help increase productivity in an elementary way.

If you analyze how long valuable tools typically wait for loading and unloading, you can see a direct effect of the intralogistics automation system, which leads to a significantly higher utilization of process equipment by making the material flow independent from human performance. Additional side effects such as reduced cycle time, stable fab flow factor or flattened WIP shafts further increase the contribution of material flow automation to get the most out of existing mature factories. Older does not mean obsolete.

SEMI: What are the biggest challenges for a successful implementation?

Esser: There is no single challenge when you automate an existing mature fab. Instead, you face a whole variety of challenges you have to tackle, ranging from historically grown non-aligned fab layouts over non-linear material flows and older non-standardized equipment to “automation unfriendly” fab environment. Also you should not underestimate the efforts to overcome the practice manual fab operation people in the cleanroom are so familiar with for many years. Before doing automation you have to think automation, i.e. you have to question all processes to make them ready for automation.

SEMI: What are the key drivers to automate a mature fab today: costs, process stability, quality or a combination of them?

Esser: This question should be better asked to our customers, but we believe it is a mix of many impacts. Most likely everybody sees the cost reduction at first, but we get more aware of process and performance stability as well as quality requirements – and here our customers’ play the most important role – become more and more focused.

SEMI: What do you expect from SEMICON Europa 2018 and why do you recommend attending the Fab Management Forum?

Esser: This year SEMICON Europa will co-locate with electronica. So it`s going to be the greatest trade fair for electronics manufacturing in Europe. We will meet innovators and decision-makers across the whole electronics supply chain.

The Fab Management Forum addresses a highly topical question that concerns all semiconductor manufacturers not only in Europe – how to handle complexity and enable the necessary flexibility to cope with customers’ needs. High-ranking speakers will give an insight into the latest technologies and best practices. I am looking forward to the lively exchange with the participants and taking away new impulses for our business.

Heinz Martin Esser is managing director at Fabmatics GmbH, responsible for sales and marketing, customer service and administration. He studied supply engineering at the University of Applied Sciences in Cologne and later earned a university degree in business administration.

Originally published on the SEMI blog.

By Alan Weber

Even for someone who has been in this industry since the days of the TI Datamath 4-function calculator and the TMS1100 4-bit microcontroller (yes, that’s been a LONG time – the movie Grease premiered the same year!), it is sometimes hard to grasp the scope and complexity of what happens in today’s leading-edge semiconductor gigafabs. In fact, the only way to comprehend the enormous volume of transactions that occur is to consider what happens in a single minute – this is illustrated in the infographic we have labeled “The Gigafab Minute.”*

It’s amazing enough to think that a single factory can start 100,000 wafers every month on their cyclical journey through 1500 process steps… and have 99%+ of them emerge 4 months later to be delivered to packaging houses and then on to waiting customers. It’s quite another to realize that all of this happens continuously (24 x 7) and automatically.

“How is this possible?” you ask.

Well, a big part of the solution is the body of SEMI standards which have evolved since the early 80s to keep pace with the ever-changing demands of the industry. From an automation standpoint, many of these standards deal with the communications between manufacturing equipment and the factory information and control systems that are essential for managing these complex, hyper-competitive global enterprises.

A significant characteristic of these standards is that they have been carefully designed to be “additive.” This means that new generations of SEMI’s communications standards do not supplant or obsolete the previous generations, but rather provide new capabilities in an incremental fashion. To appreciate the importance of this in actual practice, consider how the GEM, GEM300, and EDA/Interface A standards support the transactions that occur in a single Gigafab Minute.

Starting at 1:00 o’clock on the infographic and moving clockwise, you first notice that 2.31 wafers enter the line. Of course, these are actually released in 25-wafer 300mm FOUPs (Front-Opening Unified Pod), but 100K wafers per month translates to 2.31 per minute. Since these factories run continuously, once the line is full, it stays full. And with an average total cycle time of 4 months, this means that there are 400K wafers of WIP (work in process) in the factory at any given time. This number, and the total number of equipment (5000+), drive the rest of the calculations.

GEM (Generic Equipment Model) – SEMI E30, etc.

The GEM messaging standards were initially defined in the early 90s to support the factory scheduling and dispatching applications that decide what lots should go to what equipment, the automated material handling systems that deliver and pick-up material to/from the equipment accordingly, the recipe management systems that ensure each process step is executed properly, and the MES (Manufacturing Execution System) transactions that maintain the fidelity of the factory system’s “digital twin.”

Every minute of every day, GEM messages support and chronicle the following activities: 240 process steps are completed (i.e., 240 25-wafer lots are processed), 300 recipes are downloaded along with a set of run-specific adjustable control parameters, and 600 FOUPs are moved from one place to another (equipment, stockers, under-track storage, etc.). For each of these activities, the factory’s MES is notified instantaneously.

GEM300 – SEMI E40, E87, E90, E94, E157

With the advent of 300mm manufacturing in the mid-to-late 90s, a global team of volunteer system engineers from the leading chip makers defined the GEM300 standards to support fully automated manufacturing operations. Starting at 5:00 o’clock on the infographic, the number of transactions per minute jumps almost 3 orders of magnitude, from the monitoring of 900 control jobs across 4000 process tools to the tracking of 360,000 individual recipe step change events. This level of event granularity is essential for the latest generation of FDC (Fault Detection and Classification) applications, because precise data framing is a key prerequisite for minimizing the false alarm rate while still preventing serious process excursions. In this context, more than 6000 recipe-, product- and chamber-specific fault models may be evaluated every minute.

Simultaneously, the applications that monitor instantaneous throughput to prevent “productivity excursions” and identify systemic “wait time waste” situations depend on detailed intra-tool wafer movement events. In a fab with hundreds of multi-chamber, single-wafer processes, 75,000 or more of these events occur every minute.

EDA (Equipment Data Acquisition) – SEMI E120, E125, E132, E134, E164, etc.

Rounding out the SEMI standards in our example gigafab is the suite of EDA standards which complement the command and control functions of GEM/GEM300 with flexible, high-performance, model-based data collection. The EDA standards enable the on-demand collection of the volume and variety of “big data” required from the equipment to support the advanced analysis, machine learning, and other AI (Artificial Intelligence) applications that are becoming increasingly prevalent in leading semiconductor manufacturers. As EUV (Extreme Ultraviolet) lithography moves from pilot production to high-volume manufacturing at the 7nm process node and beyond, the litho process area will become a major source of process data by itself, generating 10 GB of data every minute. This is in addition to the 100 GB of data collected from other process areas.

The End Result

The final wedge (12:00 o’clock) in our infographic highlights the real objective – which is producing the millions of integrated circuits that fuel our global economy and provide the technologies that are an integral part of our modern way of life. Assuming a nominal die size of 50 square mm (typical of an 8 GB DRAM), the 2.31 wafers we started at 1:00 o’clock result in almost 3200 individual chips. But none of this would be possible without the pervasive factory automation technology we now take for granted. So, as you finish reading this posting on whatever device you happen to be using, take a micro-moment to acknowledge and thank the hundreds of standards volunteers whose insights and efforts made this a reality!

You may not be responsible for running a gigafab anytime soon, but the SEMI standards used in this setting are no less applicable to any Smart Manufacturing environment. Give us a call if you’d like to know more about how these technologies can benefit your operations for many years to come.

Alan Weber is Vice President, New Product Innovations, at Cimetrix Incorporated. Previously he served on the Board of Directors for eight years before joining the company as a full-time employee in 2011. Alan has been a part of the semiconductor and manufacturing automation industries for over 40 years. He holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Electrical Engineering from Rice University.

Originally published on the SEMI blog.

To scale down a transistor below a 5nm node is one of the vital concerns for VLSI industry as there are various challenges due to the shrinking of components. Several researches are going on worldwide to overcome the challenges of future technology nodes. Among them, this article reviews the potential transistor structures and materials like Carbon Nano-tube FET, Gate-All-Around FET, and Compound Semiconductors as solutions to overcome the problems of scaling the existing silicon FinFET transistor below 5nm node.

By Pavan H Vora, Akash Verma, Dhaval Parikh

The ‘Semiconductor era’ started in 1960 with the invention of the integrated circuit. In an integrated circuit, all the active-passive components and their interconnection are integrated on a single silicon wafer, offering numerous advantages in terms of portability, functionality, power, and performance. The VLSI industry is following Moore’s law for many decades, which says, “the number of transistors on a chip becomes double approximately every two years”. To get the benefits of a scaled-down transistor, VLSI industry is continuously improving transistor structure and material, manufacturing techniques, and tools for designing IC. Various techniques, which have been adopted for transistors so far, include high-K dielectric, metal gate, strained silicon, double patterning, controlling channel from more than one side, silicon on insulator and many more techniques. Some of these techniques are discussed in ‘A Review Paper on CMOS, SOI and FinFET Technology’[1].

Nowadays, the demand of the internet of things, autonomous vehicles, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and internet traffic is growing exponentially, which acts as a driving force for scaling down transistor below the existing 7nm node for higher performance. However, there are several challenges of scaling down a transistor size.

Issues with Sub-Micron Technology:

Every time we scale down a transistor size, a new technology node is generated. We have seen transistor sizes such as 28nm, 16nm, etc. Scaling down a transistor enables faster switching, higher density, low power consumption, lower cost per transistor, and numerous other gains. The CMOS (complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor) transistor base IC technology performs well up to 28nm node. However, the short channel effects become uncontrollable if we shrink down CMOS transistor below 28 nm. Below this node, a horizontal electric field generated by drain-source supply tries to govern the channel. As a result, the gate is unable to control leakage paths, which are far from the gate.

16nm/7nm Transistor Technology: FinFet and FD-SOI:

The VLSI industry has adopted FinFET and SOI transistor for 16nm and 7nm nodes, as both the structures are able to prevent the leakage issue at these nodes. The main objective of both the structures is to maximize gate-to-channel capacitance and minimize drain-to-channel capacitance[1]. In both transistor structures, the channel thickness scaling is introduced as the new scaling parameter. As the channel thickness is reduced, there are no paths, which are far from the gate area. Thus, gates have a good control over the channel, which eliminates short channel effects.

In Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) transistor, a buried oxide layer is used, which isolates the body from the substrate shown in Figure 1(a).Owing to the BOX layer, drain-source parasitic junction capacitances are reduced, which results in faster switching. The main challenge with the SOI transistor is that it is difficult to manufacture a thin silicon layer on the wafer.

Figure 1: a) FD-SOI Structure b) FinFET Structure and Channel

FinFET, which is also called as tri-gate controls channel is shown from three sides in Figure 1(b).  There is a thin vertical Si-body, which looks like a back fin of fish wrapped by the gate structure. A width of the channel is almost two times Fin height. Thus, to get higher driving strength, a multi-Fin structure is used. One of the gains with FinFET is higher driving current. The main challenge with FinFET is the complex manufacturing process.

Challenges with Technology Node below 5nm: What Next?

Reducing the body thickness results into lower mobility as surface roughness scattering increases. Since FinFET is a 3-D structure, it is less efficient in terms of thermal dissipation. Also, if we scale down the FinFET transistor size further, say below 7nm, the leakage issue becomes dominant again. Consequently, many other problems come into consideration like self-heating, threshold flattening, etc. These concerns lead to research on other possible transistor structures and replacing existing materials with new effective materials.

According to the ITRS roadmap (International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors), the next technology nodes are 5nm, 3nm, 2.5nm, and 1.5nm. Many different types of research and studies are going on in VLSI industry and academia for potential solutions to deal with these future technology nodes. Here we discuss some promising solutions like carbon nanotube FET, GAA transistor structure, and compound semiconductor for future technology nodes.

Figure 2: Transistor Technology Roadmap

CNTFET – Carbon Nano Tube FET:

CNT (Carbon Nanotube) showcases a new class of semiconductor material that consists of a single sheet of carbon atoms rolled up to form a tubular structure. CNTFET is a field-effect transistor (FET) that uses semiconducting CNT as a channel material between the two metal electrodes, which behave as source and drain contacts. Here we will discuss carbon nanotube material and how it is beneficial to FET at a lower technology node.

  • What is a Carbon Nanotube?

CNT is a tubular shaped material, made of carbon, having diameters measurable on the nanometer scale. They have a long and hollow structure and are formed from sheets of carbon that are one atom thick. It is called “Graphene”. Carbon nanotubes have varied structures, differing in length, thickness, helicity, and the number of layers. Majorly, they are classified as Single Walled Carbon Nanotube (SWCNT) and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube (MWCNT). As shown in Figure 3(a), one can see that SWCNTs are made up of a single layer of graphene, whereas MWCNTs are made up of multiple layers of graphene.

Figure 3: a) Single Walled and Multi Walled CNTs b) Chirality Vector Representation

  • Properties of Carbon Nanotube:

The carbon nanotube delivers excellent properties in areas of thermal and physical stability as discussed below:

  1. Both Metallic and Semiconductor Behavior

The CNT can exhibit metallic and semiconductor behavior. This change in behavior depends on the direction in which the graphene sheet is rolled. It is termed as chirality vector. This vector is denoted by a pair of integer (n, m) as shown in Figure 3(b). The CNT behaves as metallic if ‘n’ equals to ‘m’ or the difference of ‘n’ and ‘m’ is the integral multiple of three or else it behaves as a semiconductor [2].

  1. Incredible Mobility

SWCNTs have a great potential for application in electronics because of their capacity to behave as either metal or as a semiconductor, symmetric conduction and their capacity to carry large currents. Electrons and holes have a high current density along the length of a CNT due to the low scattering rates along the CNT axis. CNTs can carry current around 10 A/nm2, while standard metal wires have a current carrying capacity that is only around 10 nA/nm2[3].

  1. Excellent Heat Dissipation

Thermal management is an important parameter for the electronic devices’ performance. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are well-known nanomaterials for excellent heat dissipation. Moreover, they have a lesser effect of the rise in temperature on the I-V characteristics as compared to silicon [4].

CNT in Transistor Applications: CNFET

The bandgap of carbon nanotubes can be changed by its chirality and diameter and thus, the carbon nanotube can be made to behave like a semiconductor. Semiconducting CNTs can be a favorable candidate for nanoscale transistor devices for channel material as it offers numerous advantages over traditional silicon-MOSFETs. Carbon nanotubes conduct heat similar to the diamond or sapphire. Also, they switch more reliably and use much less power than silicon-based devices [5].

In addition, the CNFETS have four times higher trans-conductance than its counterpart. CNT can be integrated with a High-K material, which is offering good gate control over the channel. The carrier velocity of CNFET is twice as compared to MOSFET, due to increased mobility. A carrier mobility of N-type and P-type CNFET is similar in offering advantages in terms of same transistor size. In CMOS, PMOS (P-type metal-oxide-semiconductor) transistor size is approximately 2.5 times more than NMOS (N-type metal-oxide-semiconductor) transistor as mobility values are different.

The Fabrication process of CNTFET is a very challenging task as it requires precision and accuracy in the methodologies.Here we discuss the Top-gated CNTFET fabrication methodology.

The first step in this technique starts from the placement of carbon nanotubes onto the silicon oxide substrate. Then the individual tubes are isolated. Source and drain contacts are defined and patterned using advanced lithography. The contact resistance is then reduced by refining the connection between the contacts and CNT. The deposition of a thin top-gate dielectric is performed on the nanotube via evaporation technique. Lastly, to complete the process, the gate contact is deposited on the gate dielectric [6].

Figure 4: Concept of Carbon-Nanotube FET

Challenges of CNTFET:

There are lots of challenges in the roadmap of commercial CNFET technology.  Majority of them have been resolved to a certain level, but a few of them are yet to be overcome. Here we will discuss some of the major challenges of CNTFET.

  1. Contact Resistance

For any advanced transistor technology, the increase in contact resistance due to the low size of transistors becomes a major performance problem. The performance of the transistor degrades as the resistance of contacts increases significantly due to the scaling down of transistors. Until now, decreasing the size of the contacts on a device caused a huge drop in execution — a challenge facing both silicon and carbon nanotube transistor technologies [7].

  1. Synthesis of Nanotube

Another challenge with CNT is to change its chirality such that it behaves like a semiconductor. The synthesized tubes have a mixture of both metals and semiconductors. But, since only the semiconducting ones are useful for qualifying to be a transistor, engineering methodologies need to be invented to get a significantly better result at separating metal tubes from semiconducting tubes.

  1. To develop a non-lithographic process to place billions of these nanotubes onto the specific location of the chip poses a challenging task.

Currently, many engineering teams are carrying out research about CNTFET devices and their logic applications, both in the industries and in the universities. In the year 2015, researchers from one of the leading semiconductor companies succeeded in combining metal contacts with nanotubes using “close-bonded contact scheme”. They achieved this by putting a metal contact at the ends of the tube and making them react with the carbon to form different compounds. This technique helped them to shrink contacts below 10 nanometers without compromising the performance [8].

Gate-All-Around FET: GAAFET

One of the futuristic potential transistor structures is Gate-all-around FET. The Gate-all-around FETs are extended versions of FinFET. In GAAFET, the gate material surrounds the channel region from the four directions. In a simple structure, a silicon nanowire as a channel is wrapped by the gate structure. A vertically stacked multiple horizontal nanowires structure is proven excellent for boosting current per given area. This concept of multiple vertically stacked gate-all-around silicon nanowire is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5: Vertically Stacked Nanowires GAAFET

Apart from silicon material, some other materials like InGaAs, germanium nanowires can also be utilized for better mobility.

There are many hurdles for GAAFET in terms of complex gate manufacturing, nanowires, and contacts. One of the challenging processes is fabricating nanowires from the silicon layer as it requires a new approach for the etching process.

There are many research labs and institute working for Gate-all-around FET for lower nodes. Recently, Leuven based R&D firm claimed that they achieved excellent electrostatic control over a channel with GAAFET at sub 10nm diameter nanowire. Last year, one of the leading semiconductor companies unveiled a 5nm chip, which contains 30 billion transistors on a 50mm2chip using stacked nanowire GAAFET technology. It claimed to achieve 40% improvement in performance compared to 10nm node or 70% improvement in power consumption at the same performance.

Compound Semiconductors:

Another promising way to scale down a transistor node is the selection of novel material that exhibits higher carrier mobility. A compound semiconductor with ingredients from columns III and V are having higher mobility compared to silicon. Some compound semiconductor examples are Indium Gallium Arsenide (InGaAs), Gallium Arsenide (GaAs), and Indium Arsenide (InAs). According to various studies, integration of compound semiconductor with FinFET and GAAFET showing excellent performance at lower nodes.

The main concerns with compound semiconductor are large lattice mismatch between silicon and III-V semiconductor, resulting in defects of the transistor channel. One of the firms developed a FinFET containing V-shaped trenches into the silicon substrate. These trenches filled with indium gallium arsenide and forming the fin of the transistor. The bottom of the trench is filled with indium phosphide to reduce the leakage current. With this trench structure, it has been observed that defects terminate at the trench walls, enabling lower defects in the channel.

Conclusion:

From the 22nm node to 7nm node, FinFETs have been proven successful and it may be scaled down to one more node. Beyond that, there are various challenges like self-heating, mobility degradation, threshold flattening, etc. We have discussed how carbon nanotube’s excellent properties of motilities, heat dissipation, high current carrying capability offer promising solutions for replacing existing silicon technology. As the stack of horizontal nanowire opened a “fourth gate”, Gate-all-around transistor structure is also a good candidate for replacing vertical Fin structure of FinFET for achieving good electrostatic property. It is not clear what comes next in the technology roadmap. However, in the futuristic transistor technology, there must be changes of existing material, structure, EUV (Extreme ultraviolet) lithography process, and packaging to sustain Moore’s law.

References:

[1]  Pavan Vora, Ronak Lad, “A Review Paper on CMOS, SOI and FinFET Technology”, www.design-reuse.com/articles/

[2]  P.A Gowri Sankar, K. Udhaya Kumar, “Investigating The Effect of Chirality On Coaxial Carbon Nanotube Field Effect Transistor”, 2012 International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies (ICCEET)

[3] Rashmita Sahoo, S.K Sahoo, “Design of an efficient CNTFET using optimum number of CNT in channel region for logic gate implementation”, 2015 International Conference on VLSI Systems, Architecture, Technology and Applications (VLSI-SATA)

[4] Yijian Ouyang and Jing Guo, “Heat dissipation in carbon nanotube transistors”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 183122 (2006)

[5] Philip G. Collins & Phaedon Avouris, “Nanotubes for Electronics”, Scientific American 283, 62 – 69 (2000)

[6] Wind, S. J.; Appenzeller, J.; Martel, R.; Derycke, V.; Avouris, Ph. (2002). “Vertical scaling of carbon nanotube field-effect transistors using top gate electrodes”, Applied Physics Letters. 80 (20): 3817. Bibcode:2002ApPhL..80.3817W.

[7] Aaron D. Franklin, Wilfried Haensch, “Defining and overcoming the contact resistance challenge in scaled carbon nanotube transistors”, 72nd Device Research Conference

[8] IBM, “IBM Research Breakthrough Paves Way for Post-Silicon Future with Carbon Nanotube Electronics”, https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/47767.wss

About Authors:

Pavan Vora

Pavan Vora is working as an ASIC Physical Design Engineer at eInfochips, an Arrow company. He has more than 3 years of experience in ASIC designs for cutting technology nodes such as 12nm, 16nm FinFET, and 28nm. Pavan has expertise in ASIC P&R, LEC, LVS, Static Timing Analysis, Signal EM, DRC, and IR drop and has been awarded a Gold Medal in Master of Engineering in VLSI System Design.

Akash Verma

Akash Verma is working as an ASIC Trainee Engineer at eInfochips, an Arrow company. He has completed his bachelors in Electronics & Communication from the GIT, Gandhinagar. He is currently working on networking ASIC chip at 7nm FinFET technology, in which his accountabilities include block level APR, Static Timing Analysis and Physical Verification. His interest lies in Analog Mixed Signal designs and EDA tool’s algorithmic methodologies.

Dhaval Parikh

Dhaval Parikh is working as a Technical Manager at eInfochips, an Arrow company. He has more than 11 years of industry experience and has worked in various ASIC designs of IP’s & SoC’s, from 180nm to cutting technology node 7nm. He has been responsible for all the aspects of physical design and verification along with executing multiple projects simultaneously.

About eInfochips:

eInfochips, an Arrow company, is a global provider of product engineering and semiconductor design services. With over 500+ products developed and 40M deployments in 140 countries, eInfochips continues to fuel technological innovations in multiple verticals. The company’s service offerings include digital transformation and connected IoT solutions across various cloud platforms, including AWS and Azure.

Along with Arrow’s $27B in revenues, 19,000 employees, and 345 locations serving over 80 countries, eInfochips is primed to accelerate connected products innovation for 150,000+ global clients. eInfochips acts as a catalyst to Arrow’s Sensor-to-Sunset initiative and offers complete edge-to-cloud capabilities for its clients through Arrow Connect.

By Jay Chittooran

Last week, SEMI joined a coalition of business groups in calling for Ambassador Robert Lighthizer, U.S. Trade Representative, to enact an exclusion process for the most recent tranche of tariffs on $200 billion in goods imported from China.

While an exclusion process was provided for in the previous tariff lists, which cover about $50 billion in goods, the administration has said that no similar process will be provided on the most recent tariffs on $200 billion (List 3), which took effect Monday. SEMI members will face millions of dollars in additional duties as a result of these tariffs. This action will also curb growth, stifle innovation, and introduce significant uncertainty in the semiconductor industry.

Americans for Free Trade is a diverse coalition, which includes hundreds of companies across the United States, to illustrate the impacts of tariffs on American businesses, consumers and manufacturers. SEMI is a member of this coalition. The full text of the letter can be found here.

Any SEMI members with questions should contact Jay Chittooran, Public Policy Manager at SEMI, at [email protected].

Originally published on the SEMI blog.

Applied Energy Systems (AES), provider of high and ultra high purity gas systems, services, and solutions – including design, manufacturing, testing, installation, and expert field services – has announced the acquisition of Advanced Research Manufacturing (ARM), Inc., a specialty provider of gas purification systems based in Colorado Springs, CO. ARM, Inc. has been manufacturing high and ultra high purity gas purifiers and gas handling equipment for 20 years and boasts a worldwide installed base of point-of-use, micro-bulk and bulk gas purifiers. AES is a long-time leader in the manufacturing of high and ultra high purity gas and liquid delivery systems, and ARM’s portfolio of solutions will now be offered through AES to supplement and further expand its gas delivery equipment offerings and bring new benefits to customers seeking quality gas handling solutions.

“ARM brings getter, catalyst, and absorber purification technology to Applied Energy Systems that will complement our existing product offerings, allowing AES to provide a more complete and unique solution at a very competitive price,” said Steve Buerkel, President of Applied Energy Systems.

ARM, Inc.’s ultra high purity gas purifiers and associated gas handling equipment are used across the industrial, semiconductor, energy, medical, and pharmaceutical markets both in the U.S. and internationally – the same verticals where AES has a proven track record of enabling safe, precise gas delivery. “There is already a great deal of synergy between the AES and ARM teams in terms of our knowledge of gas handling requirements for innovative processes and applications,” said Jim Murphy, General Manager of AES.  “ARM’s products are a natural extension of our equipment offerings, and together we’ll offer customers our collective expertise to benefit their projects – whether they require gas purification or gas delivery solutions, or both.”

Brian Warrick, ARM, Inc.’s Director of Technology, added: “With AES’ and ARM’s combined resources, the research of new technologies and subsequent development of new products can occur at a more rapid pace. This will enable us to efficiently add to ARM’s existing portfolio of offerings that include purifiers as well as field engineering support.”

“We are extremely pleased to become a part of AES, and look forward to growing our market share in the purification of high and ultra high purity gas,” said Dan Spohn, Director of Global Sales and Market Development at ARM.