Tag Archives: Small Times Magazine

By Jim Dukart
NanoCon Show Daily

Sept. 22 2006 — If Wednesday’s opening day of NanoCon 2006 was primarily about the overall picture for nanotechnology in the near-term future, Thursday turned greater attention to specific instances of nanotech applications and developments today.

Mark Verbrugge, director of the materials and processes laboratory for General Motors Research & Development Center, started the show with a presentation of current developments driving nanotech in the automotive world. Two key areas Verbrugge focused on were energy storage and automotive materials.

On the issue of energy storage, he presented the challenges facing car makers who are eager to develop hybrid vehicles or — eventually — fully electric or hydrogen-powered cars and trucks.

One of the toughest challenges comes in moving hydrogen in and out of storage (vehicle fuel tanks). Nanotechnology, he said, promises to help via nanocrystalline magnesium-nickle particles that feature larger surface area, and thus faster absorption, than today’s prevalent automotive technology. Similarly, nanotechnology as applied to car batteries presents smaller particles and thus increased surface area within batteries, speeding up electrochemical processes and thus reducing voltage loss.

The goal, Verbrugge said, will be to produce vehicles that are more fuel efficient, lighter and also have improved thermoelectric waste heat recovery. At the same time, carmakers must develop systems that allow consumers to refuel (or recharge) less frequently than is now required of prototype electric or hydrogen vehicles.

Carl Kohrt, president and CEO of scientific research management organization Battelle, followed Verbrugge with comments about the worldwide growth of nanotech plus observations on current and near-term future nanotech applications.

Kohrt said recent developments in nanotech tools and nano-science are allowing companies and research institutions to dream up solutions that seemed impossible just a few years ago. He added the point that relatively low barriers to entry — compared to, say, space exploration — mean companies in smaller countries such as Singapore and Ireland are able to participate in the nanotech revolution.

Kohrt focused on three major areas he sees for nanotech processes and applications. First, in the energy sector, he sees significant efficiency gains for solar panels with the development and implementation of nano photovoltaics, using metal-oxide nanorods coated in polymers that both increase light absorption and improve electron affinity. Though many of these solar cells are still at the experimental stage, he predicted improvements of up to 30 percent in solar cell efficiency in the coming months.

Kohrt called the global need for clean water a “mega-issue” for the 21st century, noting that nanotechnology promises to aid in addressing both biological and chemical contaminants in drinking water supplies. The third area that Kohrt addressed was that of national security.

Nanotechnology offers some very promising solutions to many problems,” Kohrt concluded. “Are those problems totally solved? No. But at least we can start to see some solutions. Do we hope there will be other problems that nanotechnology can solve? Yes.”

Finally, Kohrt extolled nanotech participants and observers to look not specifically at given products, but rather at platforms from which many different solutions can be derived.

Those platforms were the subject of two more presentations Thursday, including one by David Gusdorf, director of development for the Washington Technology Center (WTC) and Don Montgomery, president and CEO of Nanomaterials Discovery Corp. (NDC).

Both spoke about how their partnership was instrumental in bringing to market a lower density microelectrode array chip for evaluating nanomaterials for battery operations, something NDC had an interest in doing but could not have done without the facilities and resources offered by the Washington Technology Center.

As a small company, Montgomery explained, NDC did not have the on-staff expertise or resources it would have needed to develop the chip itself. “We needed the support of the WTC to help us develop a promising opportunity,” he said. “It helped me avoid bringing on an experienced and expensive electrical engineering staff.”

WTC, Gusdorf countered, was able to not only provide the tools, support and research focus that NDC lacked, but also served as an important link, offering access to researchers at nearby universities in the Seattle area as well as sources for government and public support.

The morning’s final session featured a “role play” in which moderator Michael Lefenfeld, CEO of SiGNa Chemistry, asked panelists to guide him through the process of intellectual property protection for a new and promising nanotech technology or application. The panelists offered a range of advice to Lefenfeld, pointing out both the opportunities and a few of the potential pitfalls of sharing a promising invention or technology with other groups.

Top micro and nanotechnology people, products and companies honored

Las Vegas, Nev., September 21, 2006 — Small Times (TM) Magazine presented its highly respected Best of Small Tech Awards at the Small Times NanoCon International conference and trade show today in Las Vegas. This is the fifth annual Small Times (TM) Magazine Best of Small Tech Awards, which spotlight the top leaders and the biggest successes in nanotechnology, MEMS, and microsystems during the past year.

“The award winners and finalists this year truly reflect the diversity of companies and people that are shaping the MEMS and nanotechnology communities – from tools innovators to fabs to companies bringing commercial applications to a wide range of markets,” said Patti Glaza, Vice President and Group Publisher of Small Times (TM).

Best of Small Tech Award: Product
The Small Times (TM) Magazine 2006 Best of Small Tech Product of the Year award goes to an electron microscope that provides critical data for research and development on a highly stable, easy-to-use platform: FEI Titan.

Runners-up are Acrymed’s SilvaGard, Fiberstars’ EFO, Oxonica’s SERS Nanotags, and SiTimes’ SiRes Product Family.

Best of Small Tech Award: Company
CardioMEMS, Inc., captured the 2006 Best of Small Tech Company of the Year award for its new, FDA-approved implantable wireless pressure sensors, which measure pressure changes in the abdominal aorta, promising a relatively inexpensive means of managing patients with congestive heart failure by allowing healthcare providers to adjust patient medication before a crisis occurs.

Runners-up are FEI Company, Micralyne, Nantero, Inc., and SiGNa Chemistry.

Best of Small Tech Award: Business Leader
Chairman, President, and CEO of NeoPhotonics Corporation, Tim Jenks, earned the 2006 Small Times (TM) Magazine Business Leader of the Year award for the successful merger of California-based NeoPhotonics Corp. with Photon Technology, Co. Ltd., in Shenzhen China. The newly merged company has continued to thrive, with $50 million in annual sales, new product launches, European distribution, and additional acquisitions.

Runners-up are Bob Gelfond (MagiQ Technologies), Michael Natan (Oxonica, Inc.), James Rock (Akustica, Inc.), Billy Stanbery (HelioVolt Corp.).

Best of Small Tech Award: Researcher
IBM Research’s Jia Chen discovered a new way to make carbon nanotubes into light sources much brighter than large area Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) Her photon-emitting nanotubes have the potential to be produced with the same processes as conventional electronic components. Chen’s breakthrough research in this area earned her the Small Times (TM) Magazine Best of Small Tech Researcher of the Year award in 2006.

Runners-up are Russell Cowburn (Imperial College, London), James Tour (Rice University), Huikai Xie (University of Florida), and Jie Zhang (Motorola).

Best of Small Tech Awards: Innovator
James M. Tour, Rice University, developed the world’s first nanocar, a single-molecule gadget with a chassis, freely rotating axles, and wheels, measuring in total just three to four nanometers across. Tour’s ultimate goal is the development of nanomachines for bottom-up manufacturing, and it is this vision that earned him the Small Times (TM) Magazine 2006 Best of Small Tech Innovator of the Year award.

Runners-up are James Balcom (Polyfuel), Dan Gamota (Motorola), Magnus Gittins (Advance Nanotech), and Pradeep Haldar (University at Albany).

Best of Small Tech Awards: Advocate
Sean Murdock’s tireless work as the face of nanotechnology earned the Executive Director of the NanoBusiness Alliance our Best of Small Tech Advocate award for 2006. His efforts to educate representatives and senators about the importance of developing commercial nanotechnology helped push forward at least two bills promoting nanotech investment.

Runners-up are Roger Grace (Roger Grace Associates), Matthew Laudon (Nano Science and Technology Institute), Ellen McDevitt (MEMS Industry Group), and Robert D. “Skip” Rung (Oregon Nanoscience and Microtechnologies Institute).

Best of Small Tech Awards: Lifetime Achievement

Morinobu Endo, professor of engineering at Shinshu University, captured the 2006 Small Times (TM) Magazine Best of Small Tech Lifetime Achievement award. This award is in recognition of his contributions as an innovator and researcher with carbon nanotubes. He has devoted a lifetime of research in how to manufacture nanotubes more rapidly and cheaply and how to integrate them into useful objects, such as extended-life batteries. Endo has authored or co-authored more than 40 textbooks and 250 papers in peer-reviewed journals such as Nature and Science. He has received a long list of awards and honors, including the 2004 American Carbon Society Medal.

About the Awards
This is the fifth year of the prestigious Small Times (TM) Magazine Best of Small Tech Awards. Small Times staff evaluates the nominees along with seven panels of industry experts. Awards are based on accomplishments between June 1, 2005, and June 1, 2006. More details can be found in the September/October issue or online at www.smalltimes.com.

About Small Times
Small Times (TM) Media was purchased in September 2005 by PennWell Corporation, a diversified global media and information company. Small Times (TM) Magazine remains the leading source of business news and analysis about the small tech industry, which includes nanotechnology, MEMS and microsystems. Its circulation is now free to qualified subscribers around the world in both print and digital form. In addition to its news services (Small Times (TM) magazine, SmallTimes.com, Small Times Direct, Small Tech Advantage), Small Times (TM) organizes the leading nanotechnology business conference and trade show in North America, Small Times (TM) NanoCon International. Our annual Small Tech Business Directory is free to all subscribers and provided online as an industry service at SmallTechDirectory.com. For more information, visit www.smalltimes.com.

About PennWell
PennWell Corp. is a diversified business-to-business media and information company that provides quality content and integrated marketing solutions for the following industries: Oil and gas, electric power, water, electronics, nanotechnology, semiconductor, contamination control, optoelectronics, fiber optics, computer graphics, enterprise storage, fire, emergency services and dental. Founded in 1910, PennWell publishes 75 print and online magazines and newsletters, conducts 60 conferences and exhibitions on six continents, and has an extensive offering of books, maps, web sites, research and database services. In addition to PennWell’s headquarters in Tulsa, Oklahoma the Company has major offices in Nashua, New Hampshire, Houston, Texas, Campbell, California, Fairlawn, New Jersey, London, England, Moscow, Russia, Schwabisch Gmund, Germany, and Hong Kong, China.

Contact
Deborah Rodriguez
Marketing Communications Manager
Small Times Media Group
PennWell Corp.
Tel: 603.891.9482
[email protected]

# # #

By Jim Dukart
NanoCon Show Daily

Sept. 21, 2006 — David Soane only has to look in the mirror to see how central nanotech has become in his life.

Soane, a self-proclaimed “serial entrepreneur” who has founded companies such as Aclara, Nano-Tex, Innovative Construction and Building Materials and Cosmetica, addressed NanoCon 2006 in Las Vegas on Wednesday with a personal anecdote about his graying hair and the development of a new nano-based commercial hair coloring system he is working on.

The new coloring product, he said, could replace current processes that bleach and dry hair, and could be completely reversible. Those who want to change their hair color would have a wide array of pigments to choose from, he said, and a user could apply a nano-based remover that will restore his or her hair to its original color. No more waiting for “bad dye jobs” to grow out, he said, and no more baking the hair under high heat to dry a dye.

Soane’s tonsorial tale was part of a larger talk about the effect nanotech is already having and will continue to have in daily life. “Small steps can have a major impact,” he said, referring to strong opportunities for nanotech in the pulp and paper industry, building materials, and more. “Nanotech will soon impact all aspects of life,” Soane said, “from the top of your head to what you write on to what you live in.”

That point was echoed by financier Wilbur Ross, chairman and CEO of WL Ross & Co., as well as chairman of Nano-Tex and general partner of Masters Capital Nanotechnology, a firm with investments in six companies producing products based on nanotechnology.

Ross — videoconferenced in from London — predicted that the unique properties of nanotechnology will make significant inroads in the textile, contract interiors, automotive, military/defense and medical industries, to name just a few. Other areas primed for nanotech offerings, he said, include optical components for telecommunications and computer networks as well as the water, electronics and energy industries.

Nanotech, Ross noted, has not enjoyed the frenzied level of private investment that the Internet and information technology industry did a few years back, but he argued that that may turn out to be a good thing. “Perhaps this way nanotech can avoid the problems associated with a rush to invest,” Ross said, adding that nanotechnology is already making its way into the so-called “old economy” businesses he is most familiar with — cement, steel, textiles, coal and automotive supply — and will continue to do so. “Some of our large companies may become nano companies,” he said.

Thomas Sawitowski, manager of nanotechnology for Altana Chemie/BYK Chemie, spoke about the use of nanotechnology in the paint and coatings market, noting that customers are drawn to nano-scale additives that are scratch resistant, anti-microbial, water repellent, provide UV protection and can be conductive and/or antistatic. Other properties that manufacturers may want in their paint or coatings, he said, include fluorescence (particularly for security or to address counterfeiting concerns), flame retardation, possibly magnetic properties, or the ability to be a barrier to gas and/or even be self-cleaning. “There is a very broad demand for nanotechnology [in the paint and coatings market] for a broad array of applications, Sawitowski said.

“Every story I see in the paper today has a nanotechnology angle to it,” summed up Scott Livingston, managing director of investment firm The Livingston Group of Axiom Capital Management. One example he used was recent security precautions on airlines preventing the carrying of liquids aboard. “Nanotechnology will certainly be involved in detecting explosives or other hazardous materials,” Livingston said. “I see nanotechnology everywhere.”

By Jim Dukart
NanoCon Show Daily

Sept. 21, 2006 — The afternoon conference sessions at NanoCon 2006 in Las Vegas on Wednesday addressed current U.S. funding levels for nanotech, American and international nanotech policy considerations, the use of nanotech in the transportation industry and the development of nanomaterials.

In a policy and funding session, Richard Russell, associate director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy in the Executive Office of the President, pointed out that U.S. government funding for nanotechnology has nearly tripled since the adoption of the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) in fiscal year 2001.

Included as one of eight priority research areas in President Bush’s American Competitiveness Initiative, Russell said nanotech research and development will receive more than $1.2 billion in federal funding in fiscal year 2007. In addition to government support, Russell lauded corporate funding for nanotech research and development as well as the efforts of U.S. state governments. “Twenty-six states passed some form of nanotech bills last year alone,” Russell stated. “They are particularly active in creating technology transfer mechanisms such as incubators where research can be done and products developed.”

A session called “Nano Transportation” discussed nanotechnology products and development as they relate to the automotive, aerospace and military sectors. Mark Verbrugge, director of the Materials & Processes Laboratory at General Motors Research and Development, noted that the surface area efficiencies of nano-materials and nano-structures opens the door for an as yet-unknown range of new applications and uses in the automotive industry.

“Nanotechnology is a disruptive, I would say revolutionary technology,” concurred Leonard Chen, director of CRAD Pursuits for Raytheon. Sharon Smith, director of advanced technology for Lockheed Martin, noted that her company has a current contract to install nanotech-based sensors in the New York City subway system, a bio-detection application that will surely be applied in other transportation and port systems.

The Nano Materials panel spoke at length about the need to continue fundamental research in physics and chemistry, and how nanotechnology is opening up new possibilities for applications that have not even been thought of yet. Peter Krueger, head of the Bayer Working Group Nanotechnology for Bayer MaterialScience AG, said in Germany collaboration between universities, government and the private sector has been key to nanotech development. Such consortiums, he said, are helpful not only from a technology and research expertise point of view, but also as a way to fund nanotech initiatives that might be out of reach of any one sector acting on its own.

Ralf Anselmann, head of Exploration & Validation Nanotronics for Creavis Technologies & Innovation of Degussa, AG, said German universities are particularly well equipped to do basic research that private companies can then attempt to turn into products.

“Nanomaterials can be created and delivered in volume,” added Joe Cross, President & CEO of Nanophase Technologies. “So it is no longer a question of whether that can be done. Right now, it’s all about finding applications for the materials.”

By Jim Dukart
NanoCon Show Daily

Concurrent with the educational sessions of NanoCon 2006 in Las Vegas, several companies and organizations are displaying their wares and demonstrating new products and technology.

Magforce Nanotechnologies AG, for instance, is providing information on using iron oxide nanoparticles to fight cancer. The system injects the nanoparticles directly into cancer tumors, then uses a magnetic field (created by a machine that looks like a standard MRI device) to heat, or effectively “cook”, the tumorous cells. The system is currently being tested in five open trials in Germany, and Magforce expects European approval in 2008.

Creavis Technologies, a subsidiary of Degussa AG of Germany, also has products on display that are not yet in the U.S. market. It produces and is displaying a “hydrophobic” (water repellent) coating for countertops, sinks and bathtubs that it says will simplify cleaning and maintenance. The product has been offered to consumers in Germany for the past four months, but has yet to gain EPA approval for sale in the U.S. Creavis is also demonstrating a product a spokesman called “ceramic wallpaper” that it says is stain and moisture resistant and flame retardant.

Numerous other examples abound at the show — preferring nanotech products, applications and solutions in fields ranging from medical to building materials and from military and security to paints, coatings, solvents and nanopowders and materials.

By Andreas von Bubnoff
Small Times Contributing Editor

Sept. 20, 2006 — The percentage of Americans who know at least something about nanotechnology has doubled in the past two years, according to a national poll released on Tuesday by the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington DC.

At the same time, more people believe that nanotechnology has more risks than benefits, according to the poll, which was commissioned by the Wilson Center and conducted in August by Peter D. Hart Research Associates. The poll also found that the public trusts the government and universities more than companies when it comes to minimizing the risks of nanotechnology.

The announcement of the poll came two days before a Congressional hearing scheduled for Thursday which will ask the federal government about its research activities on the environmental and health risks of nanotechnology, and how much money it spends for this type of research.

The telephone poll, which interviewed 1,014 American adults, found that 30 percent know at least something about nanotechnology, compared with 16 percent in 2004.

It also found that 35 percent see more risks, as opposed to 15 percent who see more benefits. Almost half of those who have heard a lot about nanotechnology see more benefits, but only 2 percent of those who have heard nothing about nanotech see more benefits, the poll found.

“The less you know, the more skeptical and fearful you are about nanotech,” said Geoffrey Garin, president of Peter D. Hart Research Associates.

This means that the government needs to do more of the public outreach mandated by Congress in December 2003 in the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act, said David Rejeski, director of the Wilson Center’s Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. But he said not enough has happened since then. “It’s not enough to put stuff into museums and getting articles into science magazines,” he said. “It’s really about going out there and talking with people.”

The group perhaps most likely to use nanotech products such as cosmetics — women older than 50 — knows the least about nanotech, the poll found. Hart Research Associates also asked women in focus groups to discuss risks and benefits of nanotechnology in cosmetics. Women were more skeptical if they had children, Rejeski said, and many were surprised that there was little governmental oversight of cosmetics products that use nanomaterials.

“To hear that there are potential risks and no regulation, no oversight, just really made them more skeptical,” said Abigail Davenport, vice president at Hart Research Associates, who led the focus groups. There has been an ongoing debate in the nanotech sector over whether nanomaterials and other nanotechnologies need legislation that specifically covers their use, or whether existing legislation is fit to cover nanotech products.

When it comes to minimizing the risks of nanotechnology, the public’s trust is more with the government and universities than with companies, the poll found. The poll found that 69 percent say they trust the USDA and 61 percent say they trust the FDA to minimize risks, but only 49 percent trust companies. Similarly, 55 percent want the government and 54 percent want the universities to play a role in monitoring the safety and effectiveness of cosmetics, but only 43 percent want companies to play a role. Just 12 percent want companies to be the only monitor.

While most of the public appears to trust the government to address the risk of nanotechnology, it is still unclear what the government is or has been doing about studying that risk, Rejeski said. He said he expects this to be addressed in Thursday’s Congressional hearing before the House science committee.

“The government still has no strategy to deal with the environmental health and safety risk,” said Rejeski, who testified on the issue before the House science committee in November 2005. “The committee has been waiting for their strategy for a year now, and as far as we know, they won’t have a strategy by the time they meet on Thursday.”

“Last fall the administration said they were developing a detailed research plan with well laid out priorities, that it would come out in the spring of this year and would be the guide for the research activities into environment, health and safety,” said a Democratic Committee staff member who asked not to be identified. “We are still waiting to see it. So we finally decided to have a hearing to bring in the agencies and let them tell us why it’s not out yet.”

It’s unclear whether the plan will be delivered in time for the hearing, but the committee has invited Norris Alderson, who chairs the working group that is in charge of developing it. Alderson, associate commissioner for science at the Food and Drug Administration, declined to comment in advance on issues to be discussed at the hearing.

The committee has also invited Matthew Nordan of Lux Research, a nanotechnology research firm, and representatives of three federal agencies that are involved in nanotech-risk related research: the National Science Foundation, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Energy.

Andrew Maynard, chief science advisor to the Wilson Center’s Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, will also testify before the committee. Maynard wrote a report, published in July, that pointed to Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies estimates that in 2005, government agencies spent almost $11 million on research that is specifically focused on health and environmental risks associated with nanotechnology. This is different from the government’s own estimates, according to which the government spent almost $40 million on nanotech risk related research between October 2005 and September 2006.

Thursday’s hearing will likely address this discrepancy, the Democratic Committee staff member said.

Las Vegas, Nev., Sept. 20, 2006 — Small Times today announced the re-launch of its web site — SmallTimes.com. The premier online destination covering commercial micro and nanotechnology, SmallTimes.com has been enhanced with an upgrade to its Web platform. The announcement was made at Small Times NanoCon International in Las Vegas.

“The new SmallTimes.com has many new features, such as integrated webcasts and white paper support,” said David Forman, editor-in-chief at Small Times. “It is designed to be easier to read and navigate while still maintaining the look-and-feel and quality content that our readers expect.”

Launched in April 2001 and updated daily ever since, SmallTimes.com has become a must-read daily news source for information about trends in micro and nanotech manufacturing, tools and materials, as well as business issues surrounding micro and nano commercialization, including economic development, financing, and more.

Specifically, the site has the following new features:

  • All banner ads are now consistent with IAB (Interactive Advertising Bureau) standards.
  • Font sizes have been adjusted to allow for increased readability.
  • New subcategories have been added to make it easier to find relevant information.
  • Sponsored webcasts are now hosted on the site, where webcast presentations will be featured in real-time and archived for reader access.
  • Sponsored white papers are now hosted on the site, where technology and service providers can describe micro and nanotech innovations in greater detail.
  • The financial section of the site has been expanded to include a larger list of companies involved in micro and nanotechnology.
  • Micro sites are now available, such as the NanoCon Newswire, which is exclusively devoted to covering NanoCon International.
  • And much more!

At the same time, popular features like the Small Tech World in Brief and the Small Tech Newswire remain on the site, as do the most popular category areas for readers interested in micro and nanotech’s intersection with biotech, finance, energy and other related fields.

See for yourself. Check out the site at http://www.smalltimes.com!

About Small Times

Small TimesTM Media was purchased in September 2005 by PennWell Corporation, a diversified global media and information company. Small TimesTM Magazine remains the leading source of business news and analysis about nanotechnology, MEMS and microsystems. Its circulation is now free to qualified subscribers around the world in both print and digital form. In addition to its news services (Small TimesTM magazine, SmallTimes.com, Small Times Direct), Small TimesTM organizes the leading nanotechnology business conference and trade show in North America, Small TimesTM NanoCon International. Our annual Small Tech Business Directory is free to all subscribers and provided online as an industry service at SmallTechDirectory.com. For more information, visit www.smalltimes.com.

About PennWell

PennWell Corp. is a diversified business-to-business media and information company that provides quality content and integrated marketing solutions for the following industries: Oil and gas, electric power, water, electronics, nanotechnology, semiconductor, contamination control, optoelectronics, fiber optics, computer graphics, enterprise storage, fire, emergency services and dental. Founded in 1910, PennWell publishes 75 print and online magazines and newsletters, conducts 60 conferences and exhibitions on six continents, and has an extensive offering of books, maps, web sites, research and database services. In addition to PennWell’s headquarters in Tulsa, Oklahoma the Company has major offices in Nashua, New Hampshire, Houston, Texas, Campbell, California, Fairlawn, New Jersey, London, England, Moscow, Russia, Schwabisch Gmund, Germany, and Hong Kong, China.

Contact
Deborah Rodriguez
Marketing Communications Manager
Small Times Media Group
PennWell Corp.
Tel: 603.891.9482
[email protected]

# # #

Sep. 19, 2006 — Synova, a developer of water jet-guided laser technology, announced it has received a follow-on order from Vishay Intertechnology, one of the world’s largest manufacturers of discrete semiconductors and passive components, for its Laser Dicing System (LDS) 200.

Synova says that the LDS 200 demonstrated significant performance advantages, precision dicing capabilities and ROI benefits over conventional dry lasers and diamond-saw blades — all of which were factors in this most recent purchasing decision. The LDS 200 is slated for installation in January 2007 at the chipmaker’s Taiwan-based facility.

In a related announcement, Synova reports that it is teaming with Trend Laser Technology — its distribution partner in Taiwan since 2004 — to establish the latest in its string of regional micromachining centers (MMCs). Leveraging Trend Laser’s state-of-the-art facility in Taipei, the new MMC will serve as a machine and process-demonstration and application development center for Taiwan-based semiconductor and electronics companies.

Featuring an application laboratory that will house Synova’s advanced Laser MicroJet tools, the MMC will provide customers with access to the company’s water jet-guided laser technology and expertise. The new facility is expected to be fully operational by the first quarter of 2007.

Sept. 19, 2006 — Gas Cluster Ion Beam (GCIB) developer Epion Corp. announced that it has entered into a formal joint development program with one of the world’s leading semiconductor system solutions providers for the mobile, automotive and PC/AV markets and world’s number one supplier of microcontrollers. The development program will utilize Epion’s GCIB technology to develop advanced processes for CMOS logic structures for 45nm and smaller devices.

Epion’s nFusion doping system has been installed in the customer’s Japanese plant, which will allow the device manufacturer to evaluate the technical and production capabilities of the nFusion System, providing feedback to Epion.

GCIB is a room-temperature processing technique with the unique ability to modify the top few layers of atoms on the surface of a wafer. This results in an ability to perform nano-scale surface chemistry to solve leading-edge wafer-doping and deposition problems.

Sept. 19, 2006 — SUSS MicroTec announced that the first potential commercial source for C4NP glass molds has been selected. SUSS explained that the Glass MEMS Division of ULVAC COATING CORPORATION (ULCOAT) of Saitama, Japan has successfully demonstrated trial production of the reusable glass molds needed to bump wafers using IBM’s C4NP process.

“The availability of a commercial source for high quality glass molds is one of the critical aspects of this new bumping technology,” said Emmett Hughlett, vice president and business manager for C4NP at SUSS MicroTec, in a prepared statement. “We are extremely pleased to have ULCOAT on board and they have exceeded our expectations from day one.”

C4NP stands for Controlled Collapse Chip Connection — New Process and is a next generation of wafer bumping technology developed by IBM.